28.12.2012 Views

SSG No 20 - Shipgaz

SSG No 20 - Shipgaz

SSG No 20 - Shipgaz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Delay in building the JWP and failure to<br />

complete by <strong>20</strong>10, could mean the loss<br />

of important RTW shipping business. It<br />

would also be a blow to nearby Bremen/<br />

Bremerhaven, which is near saturation. For<br />

that reason, the Weser is investing EUR 90<br />

million in the JWP.<br />

You would think, as the JWP struggles to<br />

be born, that given the doubledigit<br />

container growth in Germany<br />

and the need for facilities<br />

to rival Rotterdam, any proposal<br />

for another German deepwater<br />

hub would be applauded. <strong>No</strong>t<br />

so, apparently.<br />

Cuxhaven – boxship hub<br />

The Elbe Estuary port of Cuxhaven,<br />

which lost to Wilhelmshaven<br />

in <strong>20</strong>01 in the battle to<br />

host the first deepwater port,<br />

came in for a political drubbing<br />

recently when its chief Heinrich<br />

Ahlers suggested it too now wanted to create<br />

a mega boxship hub, second only to<br />

the JWP.<br />

The proposal drew fire from both Cuxport<br />

part owner HHLA, which said it had<br />

no plans to develop Cuxhaven as a deepwater<br />

port, and from Lower Saxony premier<br />

Christian Wulff. He said “We will not<br />

support anything which could adversely<br />

affect the Wilhelmshaven deepwater port”.<br />

Ahlers had said Cuxport wanted to grow<br />

and planned big medium-term investment<br />

to turn it into Germany’s second deepwater<br />

port for mega ships. He said it was needed<br />

and that Wilhelmshaven would not cope<br />

on its own.<br />

Much of the planned development, like<br />

a fourth 240 m berth and an 85,000 sqm<br />

extension, have been around for a long<br />

time and will go ahead in any case, because<br />

Cuxhaven needs them. It all sounds very<br />

sensible. All that appears to rankle, at a delicate<br />

time, is any suggestion Cuxport might<br />

siphon off business from the future JWP.<br />

Elbe deepening could be delayed<br />

The second major threat, that to Elbe deepening<br />

in Germany’s biggest port, Hamburg,<br />

is also time-related.<br />

Deepening is now urgently needed to<br />

cope with ever bigger ships. However Port<br />

and Economics Senator Gunnar Uldall<br />

has warned it could be delayed until <strong>20</strong>09<br />

because of five thousand objections to the<br />

EUR 330 million project. Because of that,<br />

it would be “very difficult” to stick to the<br />

Hamburg mayor<br />

Ole von Beust says<br />

despite objections,<br />

Elbe deepening will<br />

start next year.<br />

timetable under which dredging will begin<br />

in <strong>20</strong>08, he said.<br />

The late good news however came from<br />

a more optimistic Hamburg Mayor Ole<br />

von Beust. He said deepening could still<br />

start next year but that the planning process<br />

will take longer.<br />

The idea is to deepen the Elbe’s main<br />

channel to handle bigger container<br />

ships drawing up to 14.5<br />

m, or about a metre more than<br />

before. About 38 million cbm<br />

of sand and sediment will be<br />

dredged between Hamburg and<br />

Cuxhaven.<br />

Deepening will go ahead<br />

Both Uldall and von Beust say<br />

the deepening will go ahead.<br />

There is no alternative, Uldall<br />

says, predicting that without it,<br />

thousands of jobs will be lost<br />

and Hamburg will be bypassed<br />

in future by the ships of major owners.<br />

This, as Hamburg heads for another<br />

record year in which 10 million TEUs and<br />

overall handling of 140 million tons are on<br />

the cards after 69.5 million tons and 4.8<br />

million TEUs were handled in the first half<br />

of <strong>20</strong>07. EUR 2.9 billion is now earmarked<br />

for new and expanded terminals to cope<br />

with a predicted 18 million TEUs and 2<strong>20</strong><br />

million tons expected overall by <strong>20</strong>15.<br />

Part of this money will come from the<br />

sale, now expected in <strong>No</strong>vember, of 30 per<br />

PORTS & MARITIME LOGISTICS<br />

cent of the shares in main operator HHLA.<br />

Analysts say as much as a thousand million<br />

Euro could be raised.<br />

The hope was for more at the start of the<br />

year. However the Hamburg Senate, earlier<br />

this year had to back down from a plan to<br />

sell up to 49.9 per cent of HHLA to private<br />

investors after union protests and stoppages.<br />

LHG sale thwarted<br />

In Lübeck, Germany’s biggest Baltic sea<br />

port, authorities had the same idea as<br />

Hamburg with a plan to sell up to 90 per<br />

cent of main operator LHG to “strategic<br />

partners” to help raise a reported EUR 110<br />

million for expansion to <strong>20</strong>15. The port is<br />

headed for a record 32–33 million tons this<br />

year. By <strong>20</strong>15 handling is expected to rise<br />

to 35–40 million tons.<br />

Under similar union and strike pressure<br />

as Hamburg, Lübeck was forced to agree to<br />

sell only 25.1 per cent of LHG and there<br />

has been little further word on progress<br />

in that sale since then. Local economist<br />

Wilhelm Wessel said the labour dispute<br />

and compromise had “reduced Lübeck’s<br />

development chances”. He said the minority<br />

share now on offer was “nowhere near<br />

as attractive to an investor as the originally<br />

discussed majority participation”.<br />

The Hamburg and Lübeck share sales<br />

both still have to run their courses and the<br />

consequences in terms of capital for port<br />

development remain uncertain. They will<br />

only become clear when the new partners<br />

Bremerhaven goes for another record year but raises worries about hinterlands in need of<br />

development.<br />

SCANDINAVIAN SHIPPING GAZETTE • OCTOBER 26, <strong>20</strong>07 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!