SSG No 20 - Shipgaz
SSG No 20 - Shipgaz
SSG No 20 - Shipgaz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Delay in building the JWP and failure to<br />
complete by <strong>20</strong>10, could mean the loss<br />
of important RTW shipping business. It<br />
would also be a blow to nearby Bremen/<br />
Bremerhaven, which is near saturation. For<br />
that reason, the Weser is investing EUR 90<br />
million in the JWP.<br />
You would think, as the JWP struggles to<br />
be born, that given the doubledigit<br />
container growth in Germany<br />
and the need for facilities<br />
to rival Rotterdam, any proposal<br />
for another German deepwater<br />
hub would be applauded. <strong>No</strong>t<br />
so, apparently.<br />
Cuxhaven – boxship hub<br />
The Elbe Estuary port of Cuxhaven,<br />
which lost to Wilhelmshaven<br />
in <strong>20</strong>01 in the battle to<br />
host the first deepwater port,<br />
came in for a political drubbing<br />
recently when its chief Heinrich<br />
Ahlers suggested it too now wanted to create<br />
a mega boxship hub, second only to<br />
the JWP.<br />
The proposal drew fire from both Cuxport<br />
part owner HHLA, which said it had<br />
no plans to develop Cuxhaven as a deepwater<br />
port, and from Lower Saxony premier<br />
Christian Wulff. He said “We will not<br />
support anything which could adversely<br />
affect the Wilhelmshaven deepwater port”.<br />
Ahlers had said Cuxport wanted to grow<br />
and planned big medium-term investment<br />
to turn it into Germany’s second deepwater<br />
port for mega ships. He said it was needed<br />
and that Wilhelmshaven would not cope<br />
on its own.<br />
Much of the planned development, like<br />
a fourth 240 m berth and an 85,000 sqm<br />
extension, have been around for a long<br />
time and will go ahead in any case, because<br />
Cuxhaven needs them. It all sounds very<br />
sensible. All that appears to rankle, at a delicate<br />
time, is any suggestion Cuxport might<br />
siphon off business from the future JWP.<br />
Elbe deepening could be delayed<br />
The second major threat, that to Elbe deepening<br />
in Germany’s biggest port, Hamburg,<br />
is also time-related.<br />
Deepening is now urgently needed to<br />
cope with ever bigger ships. However Port<br />
and Economics Senator Gunnar Uldall<br />
has warned it could be delayed until <strong>20</strong>09<br />
because of five thousand objections to the<br />
EUR 330 million project. Because of that,<br />
it would be “very difficult” to stick to the<br />
Hamburg mayor<br />
Ole von Beust says<br />
despite objections,<br />
Elbe deepening will<br />
start next year.<br />
timetable under which dredging will begin<br />
in <strong>20</strong>08, he said.<br />
The late good news however came from<br />
a more optimistic Hamburg Mayor Ole<br />
von Beust. He said deepening could still<br />
start next year but that the planning process<br />
will take longer.<br />
The idea is to deepen the Elbe’s main<br />
channel to handle bigger container<br />
ships drawing up to 14.5<br />
m, or about a metre more than<br />
before. About 38 million cbm<br />
of sand and sediment will be<br />
dredged between Hamburg and<br />
Cuxhaven.<br />
Deepening will go ahead<br />
Both Uldall and von Beust say<br />
the deepening will go ahead.<br />
There is no alternative, Uldall<br />
says, predicting that without it,<br />
thousands of jobs will be lost<br />
and Hamburg will be bypassed<br />
in future by the ships of major owners.<br />
This, as Hamburg heads for another<br />
record year in which 10 million TEUs and<br />
overall handling of 140 million tons are on<br />
the cards after 69.5 million tons and 4.8<br />
million TEUs were handled in the first half<br />
of <strong>20</strong>07. EUR 2.9 billion is now earmarked<br />
for new and expanded terminals to cope<br />
with a predicted 18 million TEUs and 2<strong>20</strong><br />
million tons expected overall by <strong>20</strong>15.<br />
Part of this money will come from the<br />
sale, now expected in <strong>No</strong>vember, of 30 per<br />
PORTS & MARITIME LOGISTICS<br />
cent of the shares in main operator HHLA.<br />
Analysts say as much as a thousand million<br />
Euro could be raised.<br />
The hope was for more at the start of the<br />
year. However the Hamburg Senate, earlier<br />
this year had to back down from a plan to<br />
sell up to 49.9 per cent of HHLA to private<br />
investors after union protests and stoppages.<br />
LHG sale thwarted<br />
In Lübeck, Germany’s biggest Baltic sea<br />
port, authorities had the same idea as<br />
Hamburg with a plan to sell up to 90 per<br />
cent of main operator LHG to “strategic<br />
partners” to help raise a reported EUR 110<br />
million for expansion to <strong>20</strong>15. The port is<br />
headed for a record 32–33 million tons this<br />
year. By <strong>20</strong>15 handling is expected to rise<br />
to 35–40 million tons.<br />
Under similar union and strike pressure<br />
as Hamburg, Lübeck was forced to agree to<br />
sell only 25.1 per cent of LHG and there<br />
has been little further word on progress<br />
in that sale since then. Local economist<br />
Wilhelm Wessel said the labour dispute<br />
and compromise had “reduced Lübeck’s<br />
development chances”. He said the minority<br />
share now on offer was “nowhere near<br />
as attractive to an investor as the originally<br />
discussed majority participation”.<br />
The Hamburg and Lübeck share sales<br />
both still have to run their courses and the<br />
consequences in terms of capital for port<br />
development remain uncertain. They will<br />
only become clear when the new partners<br />
Bremerhaven goes for another record year but raises worries about hinterlands in need of<br />
development.<br />
SCANDINAVIAN SHIPPING GAZETTE • OCTOBER 26, <strong>20</strong>07 53