30.12.2012 Views

On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe

On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe

On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>On</strong>-<strong>line</strong> Journal <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />

Issue <strong>no</strong>. 4/<strong>2012</strong><br />

For this purpose, this interpretative study will utilize two qualitative research methods:<br />

document and discourse analysis. The first section of this study will set <strong>the</strong> context for our<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis, briefly underlining <strong>the</strong> Russian foreign policy towards <strong>the</strong> Black Sea<br />

region after <strong>the</strong> collapse of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. The next section will include an analysis for<br />

each indicator allowing us to assess <strong>the</strong> level of Russian cooperation within <strong>the</strong> region for<br />

<strong>the</strong> last 10 years and will show how this level fluctuated across time, pointing to essential<br />

events that could determine a reformulation of national policies towards this region. The<br />

study will emphasize which are <strong>the</strong> main areas that hamper <strong>the</strong> cooperation within <strong>the</strong><br />

region and will help creating a cooperation project adjusted to respond <strong>the</strong> main problems<br />

identified.<br />

1. Russian foreign policy and its role in <strong>the</strong> Black Sea regional deadlock<br />

Russian foreign policy records across <strong>the</strong> time show that Russia never considered <strong>the</strong> Black<br />

Sea region as being out of its sphere of influence and consequently formulated all her<br />

actions in accordance with this belief, using interdependence constraints whenever NATO<br />

or <strong>the</strong> EU have attempted to increase <strong>the</strong>ir influence in <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

As argued by Kobrinskaya, after <strong>the</strong> collapse of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, Russian foreign policy<br />

towards this region has gone through at least four stages and <strong>no</strong>w we are witnessing <strong>the</strong><br />

fifth one, in which Russia has recovered its strength and confidence utilizing <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

security threat in order to maintain its regional influence and control.<br />

1. The “initial phase” took place between 1991 and 1994 and it was characterized by<br />

<strong>the</strong> appearance of <strong>the</strong> armed ethnic conflict, <strong>the</strong>ir “freezing,” and <strong>the</strong> establishment<br />

of a new post-Soviet status quo;<br />

2. The “Chechen” phase took place between1995 and 2002, when Russia mainly<br />

viewed <strong>the</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong> BSR through <strong>the</strong> prism of <strong>the</strong> Chechen war;<br />

3. The “recovery” period took place between 2003 and 2008, when Russia began<br />

acting along several dimensions. During this period <strong>the</strong> Russian president declared<br />

<strong>the</strong> Black Sea region as a zone of Russia’s “strategic interests” considering <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that this region provides Russia with a direct exit to its most important transport<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!