On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>On</strong>-<strong>line</strong> Journal <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Issue <strong>no</strong>. 4/<strong>2012</strong><br />
For this purpose, this interpretative study will utilize two qualitative research methods:<br />
document and discourse analysis. The first section of this study will set <strong>the</strong> context for our<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis, briefly underlining <strong>the</strong> Russian foreign policy towards <strong>the</strong> Black Sea<br />
region after <strong>the</strong> collapse of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union. The next section will include an analysis for<br />
each indicator allowing us to assess <strong>the</strong> level of Russian cooperation within <strong>the</strong> region for<br />
<strong>the</strong> last 10 years and will show how this level fluctuated across time, pointing to essential<br />
events that could determine a reformulation of national policies towards this region. The<br />
study will emphasize which are <strong>the</strong> main areas that hamper <strong>the</strong> cooperation within <strong>the</strong><br />
region and will help creating a cooperation project adjusted to respond <strong>the</strong> main problems<br />
identified.<br />
1. Russian foreign policy and its role in <strong>the</strong> Black Sea regional deadlock<br />
Russian foreign policy records across <strong>the</strong> time show that Russia never considered <strong>the</strong> Black<br />
Sea region as being out of its sphere of influence and consequently formulated all her<br />
actions in accordance with this belief, using interdependence constraints whenever NATO<br />
or <strong>the</strong> EU have attempted to increase <strong>the</strong>ir influence in <strong>the</strong> region.<br />
As argued by Kobrinskaya, after <strong>the</strong> collapse of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, Russian foreign policy<br />
towards this region has gone through at least four stages and <strong>no</strong>w we are witnessing <strong>the</strong><br />
fifth one, in which Russia has recovered its strength and confidence utilizing <strong>the</strong> energy<br />
security threat in order to maintain its regional influence and control.<br />
1. The “initial phase” took place between 1991 and 1994 and it was characterized by<br />
<strong>the</strong> appearance of <strong>the</strong> armed ethnic conflict, <strong>the</strong>ir “freezing,” and <strong>the</strong> establishment<br />
of a new post-Soviet status quo;<br />
2. The “Chechen” phase took place between1995 and 2002, when Russia mainly<br />
viewed <strong>the</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong> BSR through <strong>the</strong> prism of <strong>the</strong> Chechen war;<br />
3. The “recovery” period took place between 2003 and 2008, when Russia began<br />
acting along several dimensions. During this period <strong>the</strong> Russian president declared<br />
<strong>the</strong> Black Sea region as a zone of Russia’s “strategic interests” considering <strong>the</strong> fact<br />
that this region provides Russia with a direct exit to its most important transport<br />
22