On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
On-line journal no. 4 – July 2012 - Modelling the New Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>On</strong>-<strong>line</strong> Journal <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Europe</strong><br />
Issue <strong>no</strong>. 4/<strong>2012</strong><br />
These phrases amplify <strong>the</strong> real political nature of <strong>the</strong> problem. In fact, for <strong>the</strong> political<br />
communication to be able to build a bridge between <strong>Europe</strong> and its citizens (EC 2001: 3), it<br />
needs both sides to be stable. That is <strong>no</strong>t <strong>the</strong> case. The <strong>Europe</strong>an Union is in search for a<br />
new institutional system and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens are confused by <strong>the</strong> complexity of a<br />
global world. It is more convenient <strong>no</strong>t to offer new strategies, or develop new instruments<br />
to make that connection between <strong>Europe</strong> and its citizens possible, but to assign <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an political communication with a<strong>no</strong><strong>the</strong>r objective: to energize <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
democracy.<br />
As <strong>Europe</strong> becomes more concrete, <strong>the</strong> political process of unification loses support. This<br />
paradox is connected with <strong>the</strong> fable legitimacy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an institutions. Researchers<br />
(see Boual 1999) remind us that <strong>the</strong> political construction of <strong>Europe</strong> was and is an elitist<br />
process where <strong>the</strong> citizens are more excluded than involved. They mention <strong>the</strong> problems<br />
tied to <strong>the</strong> absence of real political parties, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an juridical illegibility or <strong>the</strong> lack of<br />
imagination of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an elites trapped in a sterile debate between federation and<br />
confederation. Politicians, who consider only <strong>the</strong> national framework as genuine, or <strong>the</strong>y<br />
consider necessary to associate <strong>the</strong> civil society with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an process, sustain <strong>the</strong><br />
absence of legitimacy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an process.<br />
The EU’s institutions can<strong>no</strong>t live in a void. They need <strong>the</strong> support of <strong>Europe</strong>an public<br />
opinion, and if <strong>the</strong>y lose it, <strong>the</strong>ir own future will be endangered. If more democracy at <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an level is <strong>the</strong> answer <strong>–</strong> as has been claimed for decades <strong>–</strong> what can be done to<br />
foster it? Successive treaties and projects like <strong>the</strong> constitution are only one answer. The<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r must be <strong>the</strong> creation of a <strong>Europe</strong>an “public sphere” and a genuine <strong>Europe</strong>an public<br />
opinion. The debate shows that <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>no</strong>t a panacea for approaching <strong>Europe</strong> to its citizens<br />
and create a veritable <strong>Europe</strong>an conscience and mentality. The solution lies in details.<br />
Journalistic and informative platforms are needed as much as think tanks to make EU more<br />
comprehensible. <strong>Europe</strong>ans must understand that <strong>the</strong>ir national universe does <strong>no</strong>t end<br />
where <strong>Europe</strong> starts.<br />
Today, with <strong>the</strong> abandon of <strong>the</strong> constitutional treaty, <strong>Europe</strong> is in crisis. It is time to<br />
84