02.01.2013 Views

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 18 Fluids and fluid flow<br />

that the total weight is less than the sum of the weights put into the container,<br />

unless the container was full of water to the brim be<strong>for</strong>e we put in the sand.<br />

In that case, the weight of water lost is equal to the weight of water displaced<br />

and this has to be taken into account.<br />

If we divide Equation 12.2a by the area of the base, we get<br />

This suggests that the pressure exerted by the solids is only acting on the<br />

proportion of area occupied by solids, (1 - f), and that the water is only<br />

acting on the proportion f.<br />

Karl Terzaghi (as we saw in Chapter 9) examined the question of buoyancy<br />

in concrete dams. He postulated that buoyancy only acts on the solid surfaces<br />

exposed to water in the pore spaces, but he found that the buoyant <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

was very close to yv(1- f), and that there<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>for</strong>ce of buoyancy acts on<br />

the total area (1 - f), irrespective of the areas of contact between grains. He<br />

later found the same results in clays. Consequently, he stated that the total<br />

stress in porous solids is divided between the effective stress, a, transmitted<br />

through solids and the pore-fluid pressure (he called it the neutral stress). To<br />

be a bit more precise,<br />

where S is the vertical component of total stress. This is known as Terzaghi's<br />

relationship. It is now known not to be exact, but it is sufficiently close <strong>for</strong><br />

most geological purposes. (One cannot avoid a clash of symbols: this a is<br />

not the surface tension.)<br />

Reverting now to Equation 12.2a we see that that is but one possible<br />

partition. Substituting into Equation 12.3 the expressions <strong>for</strong> S and p, we<br />

can write<br />

The effective stress is due to the partial density of the solids less the water they<br />

displace, and it is this partition of total stress that agrees with experimental<br />

results (see Hubbert and Rubey 1959: 139-142).<br />

The result is important because it is the effective stress that leads to<br />

mechanical compaction of sediments and sedimentary rocks under gravity.<br />

Terzaghi called the water pressure the neutral stress because it has no direct<br />

r6le in the de<strong>for</strong>mation of the grains.<br />

Another important result is that the depth of water over the top of the sand<br />

makes no difference to the effective stress. Imagine that there is a depth 1 of<br />

Copyright 2002 by Richard E. Chapman

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!