02.01.2013 Views

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 Some dangers of mathematical statistics<br />

Table 13.2 Measured values of the<br />

solid proportion<br />

Vo, of 5 550 m s-' . Linear regression analysis gives the <strong>for</strong>mula<br />

with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.90 with 11 degrees of freedom, which<br />

is highly significant. This seems to be entirely satisfactory. However, linear<br />

regression analysis of the logarithms of the quantities reveals that the natural<br />

relationship cannot be linear because the slope is much nearer 0.5 than 1.<br />

The correlation coefficient is also 0.90.<br />

Linear regression analysis of the logarithms leads to the following<br />

equation:<br />

Now, one boundary condition is that when the porosity is zero and 1 -f = 1,<br />

the dimensionless velocity V/Vo = 1. The coefficient 6 must there<strong>for</strong>e also<br />

equal 1, not 0.97. If we constrain the line so that it passes through the points<br />

In (1,l) and the mean values of In (1 - f ) and In (V/Vo) the slope is 0.52<br />

and a good practical <strong>for</strong>mula turns out to be<br />

This satisfies the boundary conditions, and it only remains to determine the<br />

best value of Vo to use. This is a very different <strong>for</strong>mula from the one that<br />

Copyright 2002 by Richard E. Chapman

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!