02.01.2013 Views

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

Physics for Geologists, Second edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13 Some dangers of mathematical<br />

statistics<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e we look at these dangers we should look at one of the hidden dangers<br />

of computers and electronic calculators in general.<br />

How many significant figures?<br />

The number of significant figures in a number is largely a matter of common<br />

sense. If you read that Brazil's coastline is 7491 km long, common sense tells<br />

you that 7500 is a reasonable figure. If the measurement was made some<br />

years ago, the natural changes have certainly altered the figure (even if it<br />

could be measured to the nearest kilometre). In Chapter 3 in the context of<br />

sea-level we asked what we mean when we say that Mount Everest is 8 840<br />

or 8 850 or 8 835m above sea-level. If you do not know the level of the<br />

datum with precision, clearly there is no meaning in quibbling about metres,<br />

but if all the elevations of the Himalayas are referred to some datum, then<br />

they have relative values. Likewise if you measure elevation with an aneroid<br />

barometer, it makes no practical sense to give elevations to the metre even<br />

if you can read the instrument to the nearest metre. In Chapter 8 we looked<br />

at the positions of the magnetic poles in decimal degrees, 0.01 of a degree<br />

being 0.6 nautical miles or a little more than a kilometre.<br />

With the advent of calculators and computers it has become possible to<br />

calculate with great apparent precision - almost to as many decimal places<br />

as you wish. But to do so can be a danger to understanding. For example,<br />

you want to know the monthly interest payments on a loan you made of<br />

$1000 <strong>for</strong> a year at 4.45% per annum, so you write in your spreadsheet<br />

$1000 x 0.0445112 = $3.71. The number your computer or calculator<br />

actually uses is 3.7083 (the 3 recurring). You would gain less than a cent<br />

each month and the error is insignificant. Lend a million dollars on the same<br />

terms and the monthly interest would be $3 708.33.<br />

The point here is that you may be using precision without being aware of it.<br />

If you measure a rectangular field and find the sides are 246.52 x 197.32 m -<br />

that is, to the nearest centimetre - it may seem reasonable to believe the<br />

computer that gives its area as 48 643.326 4m2 rounded to 48 643.33. But<br />

the long side might have been 246.516 and the short side 197.316, giving<br />

Copyright 2002 by Richard E. Chapman

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!