Radiation Protection Radiation Protection

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Member States on UNSCEAR Argentina Brazil Mexico Peru Australia China India Indonesia Japan Korea Pakistan Canada USA Egypt Sudan Belgium Belarus Finland France Germany Poland Russia Slovakia Spain Sweden UK Ukraine 134
The latest UNSCEAR reports Sources Efects 26 July, 2012 Hereditable New UNSCEAR 2000 Report (sources): http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_1.html UNSCEAR 2000 Report (effects): http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_2.html UNSCEAR 2001Report (hereditary): http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2001.html WNU-Summer Institute 135 UNSCEAR 2006 Report (new): http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2006_1.html 135
Page 1 and 2:
WNU-Summer Institute 2012 Christ Ch
Page 3 and 4:
FIRST PART Epistemology: Radiation
Page 5 and 6:
Radioactive substance (radioactivit
Page 7 and 8:
Absorbed dose, D (gray or rad) Radi
Page 9 and 10:
Activity (Bq) Fluence (cm-2 Fluence
Page 11 and 12:
Natural Cosmic Cosmic rays Terrestr
Page 13 and 14:
OSU, Stillwater, OK, USA, February
Page 15 and 16:
Medical sources
Page 17 and 18:
Annual average per-caput dose (in m
Page 20 and 21:
Military activities 20
Page 22 and 23:
Annual effective dose (mSv) Doses d
Page 24 and 25:
Global average levels Natural sourc
Page 26 and 27:
Annual effective dose (mSv) 6 5 4 3
Page 28 and 29:
Annual per caput dose (mSv) for USA
Page 30 and 31:
(3) Recent Developments on the epis
Page 32 and 33:
26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Institute
Page 34 and 35:
26 July, 2012 34
Page 36 and 37:
26 July, 2012 Radiation harm to DNA
Page 39:
Many other mutations occur due to D
Page 43 and 44:
26 July, 2012 0.5 Mev WNU-Summer I
Page 45 and 46:
26 July, 2012 Chromosomes deletions
Page 48 and 49:
26 July, 2012 Chromosomal aberratio
Page 50 and 51:
26 July, 2012 Probability of mutati
Page 52 and 53:
26 July, 2012 First possible outcom
Page 54 and 55:
26 July, 2012 Cell killingat around
Page 60 and 61:
26 July, 2012 Third possible outcom
Page 62 and 63:
26 July, 2012 Altered process WNU-S
Page 64 and 65:
26 July, 2012 Stochastic effects Ca
Page 66:
Radiation mutates DNA 26 July, 2012
Page 69 and 70:
26 July, 2012 Radioepidemiology (Ep
Page 71 and 72:
26 July, 2012 Difficult to assess!
Page 73 and 74:
26 July, 2012 The radium dial paint
Page 75 and 76:
26 July, 2012 ..the Mayak cohort of
Page 77 and 78:
…all these victims of radiation e
Page 79 and 80:
Solid Cancer Mortality 47 years of
Page 81 and 82:
26 July, 2012 Hereditable Effects W
Page 83 and 84: The risk is so low that the estimat
Page 85 and 86: 26 July, 2012 Antenatal Effects WNU
Page 87 and 88: 26 July, 2012 1000mSv = IQ WNU-Summ
Page 89: Latest news 89
Page 94 and 95: Likelihood of health effects 100% (
Page 96 and 97: Likelihood of health effects 100% (
Page 98 and 99: 26 July, 2012 Take away points WNU-
Page 100 and 101: Dose Very low dose: about 10 mSv or
Page 102 and 103: Remember! 1. Radiation exposure at
Page 104 and 105: Additional information to the FIRST
Page 106 and 107: Physics and chemistry Biology 10 -1
Page 108 and 109: New UNSCEAR’s assessments Epidem
Page 110 and 111: 26 July, 2012 Chernobyl workers,
Page 112 and 113: 26 July, 2012 Adaptive Response + M
Page 114 and 115: The role of apoptosis (cell killing
Page 116 and 117: 26 July, 2012 Genomic instability
Page 118 and 119: Challenge to the paradigm Mutation
Page 120 and 121: Bystander effects The so-called “
Page 122 and 123: 26 July, 2012 Signals via intercell
Page 124 and 125: 26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Institute
Page 126 and 127: 26 July, 2012 Effects in another or
Page 128 and 129: Does radiation exposure affect the
Page 130 and 131: (1) The International Organizations
Page 132 and 133: UNSCEAR 26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer In
Page 137 and 138: ICRP 26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Insti
Page 139 and 140: First ICRP meeting 1928 139
Page 141 and 142: 141
Page 143 and 144: 26 July, 2012 The International Ato
Page 145 and 146: to establish standards IAEA statuto
Page 147 and 148: International Labour Organisation 1
Page 149 and 150: (2) The International Radiation Pro
Page 151 and 152: Total background incidence of effec
Page 153 and 154: Detriment-adjusted Nominal Risk Coe
Page 155 and 156: Time Protection basic dogma Shiel
Page 159 and 160: The principles of radiological prot
Page 161 and 162: The Principle of Justification •
Page 163 and 164: adioactive discharges (bad) Is the
Page 165 and 166: Justification!
Page 167 and 168: Detriment Detriment +Social cost Op
Page 169 and 170: Restrictions: Restrictions: dose li
Page 171 and 172: Source constraint 26 July, 2012 171
Page 173 and 174: The principle of protection of futu
Page 175 and 176: D Doses after 1 year of operation 1
Page 177 and 178: Doses after 3 years of operation D
Page 179 and 180: Types of exposure situations
Page 181 and 182: Planned exposure situations, are si
Page 183 and 184: Emergency exposure situations, •
Page 185 and 186:
Emergency exposure situations Extan
Page 187 and 188:
Doses to be constrained are those c
Page 189 and 190:
Guidance for the protection of pati
Page 193 and 194:
Workers (voluntary and individually
Page 195 and 196:
The female worker: protecting the u
Page 197 and 198:
Members of the Public (involuntary
Page 199 and 200:
Natural background radiation (plann
Page 201 and 202:
Doses to be constrained are those c
Page 203 and 204:
‘Interventions’ (in existing an
Page 205 and 206:
CRITERIA FOR INTERVENING (Extant An
Page 207 and 208:
The use of a reference level in an
Page 209 and 210:
(4) The International Regime 26 Jul
Page 211 and 212:
“For their efforts [i] to prevent
Page 213 and 214:
Legally Binding Conventions 213
Page 215 and 216:
Convention on Assistance in the Cas
Page 217 and 218:
Joint Convention on the Safety of S
Page 219 and 220:
International Radiation Safety Stan
Page 221 and 222:
Long experience 1962: first interna
Page 223 and 224:
Safety Standards Hierarchy Safety F
Page 225:
Safety Principles 1: Responsibilit
Page 228 and 229:
Provisions for the application of t
Page 230 and 231:
WNU-Summer Institute 230
Page 232 and 233:
232
Page 234 and 235:
234
Page 236 and 237:
236
Page 238 and 239:
Take away points 1. Additional dose
Page 240 and 241:
Download into your computer the fil
Page 242 and 243:
Additional information to the SECON
Page 244 and 245:
Policy Implications on effects at l
Page 246 and 247:
Certainty (100%) 26 July, 2012 Like
Page 248 and 249:
Dealing with uncertainties Is it pl
Page 250 and 251:
Nominal statistical uncertainty dis
Page 252 and 253:
26 July, 2012 Cumulative probabilit
Page 254 and 255:
26 July, 2012 Cumulative probabilit
Page 256 and 257:
Policy Implications: plausibility o
Page 258 and 259:
Attributability Attribute: regard s
Page 260 and 261:
Control group “N” people “C
Page 262 and 263:
Limitation of knowledge in The sta
Page 264 and 265:
Dose (mSv ( mSv) 10 2 10 1 10 -0 10
Page 266 and 267:
C H E R N O B Y L
Page 268 and 269:
Radiation Doses Average over 10 yea
Page 270:
Dose (mSv ( mSv) 10 2 10 1 10 -0 Ch
Page 273 and 274:
273
Page 275:
The ‘liquidators’ “ЛIКВIД
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283:
agonzale@arn.gob.ar 26 July, 2012 T
show all

Radiation Protection Radiation Protection

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?