Radiation Protection Radiation Protection

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Take away points 1. It is plausible that radiation exposure at low doses be detrimental to public health and, therefore: people shall be protected against radiation exposure at any dose however small. 2. It is impossible and therefore incorrect to attribute health effects to low-dose radiation exposure situations. 26 July, 2012 WNU, 282 ,
agonzale@arn.gob.ar 26 July, 2012 Thank you! Av. del Libertador 8250 Buenos Aires Argentina WNU, , +541163231758 283
Page 1 and 2:
WNU-Summer Institute 2012 Christ Ch
Page 3 and 4:
FIRST PART Epistemology: Radiation
Page 5 and 6:
Radioactive substance (radioactivit
Page 7 and 8:
Absorbed dose, D (gray or rad) Radi
Page 9 and 10:
Activity (Bq) Fluence (cm-2 Fluence
Page 11 and 12:
Natural Cosmic Cosmic rays Terrestr
Page 13 and 14:
OSU, Stillwater, OK, USA, February
Page 15 and 16:
Medical sources
Page 17 and 18:
Annual average per-caput dose (in m
Page 20 and 21:
Military activities 20
Page 22 and 23:
Annual effective dose (mSv) Doses d
Page 24 and 25:
Global average levels Natural sourc
Page 26 and 27:
Annual effective dose (mSv) 6 5 4 3
Page 28 and 29:
Annual per caput dose (mSv) for USA
Page 30 and 31:
(3) Recent Developments on the epis
Page 32 and 33:
26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Institute
Page 34 and 35:
26 July, 2012 34
Page 36 and 37:
26 July, 2012 Radiation harm to DNA
Page 39:
Many other mutations occur due to D
Page 43 and 44:
26 July, 2012 0.5 Mev WNU-Summer I
Page 45 and 46:
26 July, 2012 Chromosomes deletions
Page 48 and 49:
26 July, 2012 Chromosomal aberratio
Page 50 and 51:
26 July, 2012 Probability of mutati
Page 52 and 53:
26 July, 2012 First possible outcom
Page 54 and 55:
26 July, 2012 Cell killingat around
Page 60 and 61:
26 July, 2012 Third possible outcom
Page 62 and 63:
26 July, 2012 Altered process WNU-S
Page 64 and 65:
26 July, 2012 Stochastic effects Ca
Page 66:
Radiation mutates DNA 26 July, 2012
Page 69 and 70:
26 July, 2012 Radioepidemiology (Ep
Page 71 and 72:
26 July, 2012 Difficult to assess!
Page 73 and 74:
26 July, 2012 The radium dial paint
Page 75 and 76:
26 July, 2012 ..the Mayak cohort of
Page 77 and 78:
…all these victims of radiation e
Page 79 and 80:
Solid Cancer Mortality 47 years of
Page 81 and 82:
26 July, 2012 Hereditable Effects W
Page 83 and 84:
The risk is so low that the estimat
Page 85 and 86:
26 July, 2012 Antenatal Effects WNU
Page 87 and 88:
26 July, 2012 1000mSv = IQ WNU-Summ
Page 89:
Latest news 89
Page 94 and 95:
Likelihood of health effects 100% (
Page 96 and 97:
Likelihood of health effects 100% (
Page 98 and 99:
26 July, 2012 Take away points WNU-
Page 100 and 101:
Dose Very low dose: about 10 mSv or
Page 102 and 103:
Remember! 1. Radiation exposure at
Page 104 and 105:
Additional information to the FIRST
Page 106 and 107:
Physics and chemistry Biology 10 -1
Page 108 and 109:
New UNSCEAR’s assessments Epidem
Page 110 and 111:
26 July, 2012 Chernobyl workers,
Page 112 and 113:
26 July, 2012 Adaptive Response + M
Page 114 and 115:
The role of apoptosis (cell killing
Page 116 and 117:
26 July, 2012 Genomic instability
Page 118 and 119:
Challenge to the paradigm Mutation
Page 120 and 121:
Bystander effects The so-called “
Page 122 and 123:
26 July, 2012 Signals via intercell
Page 124 and 125:
26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Institute
Page 126 and 127:
26 July, 2012 Effects in another or
Page 128 and 129:
Does radiation exposure affect the
Page 130 and 131:
(1) The International Organizations
Page 132 and 133:
UNSCEAR 26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer In
Page 134 and 135:
Member States on UNSCEAR Argentina
Page 137 and 138:
ICRP 26 July, 2012 WNU-Summer Insti
Page 139 and 140:
First ICRP meeting 1928 139
Page 141 and 142:
141
Page 143 and 144:
26 July, 2012 The International Ato
Page 145 and 146:
to establish standards IAEA statuto
Page 147 and 148:
International Labour Organisation 1
Page 149 and 150:
(2) The International Radiation Pro
Page 151 and 152:
Total background incidence of effec
Page 153 and 154:
Detriment-adjusted Nominal Risk Coe
Page 155 and 156:
Time Protection basic dogma Shiel
Page 159 and 160:
The principles of radiological prot
Page 161 and 162:
The Principle of Justification •
Page 163 and 164:
adioactive discharges (bad) Is the
Page 165 and 166:
Justification!
Page 167 and 168:
Detriment Detriment +Social cost Op
Page 169 and 170:
Restrictions: Restrictions: dose li
Page 171 and 172:
Source constraint 26 July, 2012 171
Page 173 and 174:
The principle of protection of futu
Page 175 and 176:
D Doses after 1 year of operation 1
Page 177 and 178:
Doses after 3 years of operation D
Page 179 and 180:
Types of exposure situations
Page 181 and 182:
Planned exposure situations, are si
Page 183 and 184:
Emergency exposure situations, •
Page 185 and 186:
Emergency exposure situations Extan
Page 187 and 188:
Doses to be constrained are those c
Page 189 and 190:
Guidance for the protection of pati
Page 193 and 194:
Workers (voluntary and individually
Page 195 and 196:
The female worker: protecting the u
Page 197 and 198:
Members of the Public (involuntary
Page 199 and 200:
Natural background radiation (plann
Page 201 and 202:
Doses to be constrained are those c
Page 203 and 204:
‘Interventions’ (in existing an
Page 205 and 206:
CRITERIA FOR INTERVENING (Extant An
Page 207 and 208:
The use of a reference level in an
Page 209 and 210:
(4) The International Regime 26 Jul
Page 211 and 212:
“For their efforts [i] to prevent
Page 213 and 214:
Legally Binding Conventions 213
Page 215 and 216:
Convention on Assistance in the Cas
Page 217 and 218:
Joint Convention on the Safety of S
Page 219 and 220:
International Radiation Safety Stan
Page 221 and 222:
Long experience 1962: first interna
Page 223 and 224:
Safety Standards Hierarchy Safety F
Page 225:
Safety Principles 1: Responsibilit
Page 228 and 229:
Provisions for the application of t
Page 230 and 231:
WNU-Summer Institute 230
Page 232 and 233: 232
Page 234 and 235: 234
Page 236 and 237: 236
Page 238 and 239: Take away points 1. Additional dose
Page 240 and 241: Download into your computer the fil
Page 242 and 243: Additional information to the SECON
Page 244 and 245: Policy Implications on effects at l
Page 246 and 247: Certainty (100%) 26 July, 2012 Like
Page 248 and 249: Dealing with uncertainties Is it pl
Page 250 and 251: Nominal statistical uncertainty dis
Page 252 and 253: 26 July, 2012 Cumulative probabilit
Page 254 and 255: 26 July, 2012 Cumulative probabilit
Page 256 and 257: Policy Implications: plausibility o
Page 258 and 259: Attributability Attribute: regard s
Page 260 and 261: Control group “N” people “C
Page 262 and 263: Limitation of knowledge in The sta
Page 264 and 265: Dose (mSv ( mSv) 10 2 10 1 10 -0 10
Page 266 and 267: C H E R N O B Y L
Page 268 and 269: Radiation Doses Average over 10 yea
Page 270: Dose (mSv ( mSv) 10 2 10 1 10 -0 Ch
Page 273 and 274: 273
Page 275: The ‘liquidators’ “ЛIКВIД
Page 279 and 280: Certainty (100%) 26 July, 2012 Like
Page 281: Certainty (100%) 26 July, 2012 Like
show all

Radiation Protection Radiation Protection

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?