06.01.2013 Views

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

only 13 out of 31 of the main texts examined here – in any other field this sort of<br />

methodology would be suspect. Layton is closely associated with the work done on<br />

The Nag Hammadi Library in English and has made major contributions therein.<br />

Yamauchi manifests an even narrower textual approach to an exceedingly<br />

complex textual and socio-historical issue. In going after “pre-Christian Gnosticism”<br />

one might expect at least a treatment of all the texts in Category 1; instead we have a<br />

controversial thesis derived from an amazingly sparse selection of available texts. The<br />

socio-historical picture which one would expect to be developed in a discussion as to<br />

whether this group precedes that, is non-existent.<br />

Pétrement’s work, like Yamauchi, is concerned with disproving the scholarly<br />

consensus that Gnostic thought preceded Christian, although she does not settle for<br />

his rather vague picture of simultaneity for the two religious developments, instead<br />

opting for the unlikely thesis of complete Christian precedence In pursuing this idée<br />

fixe Pétrement displays a more generous distribution of references than Layton or<br />

Yamauchi, not, however, departing from the overall pattern of a propensity to use<br />

Christian-Gnostic sources and a complete lack of interest in Egypt.<br />

The three remaining works on Gnosticism and early Christianity, Gnostic<br />

origins, and the study of the Feminine in Gnostic thought are far better than the first<br />

three enterprises--undoubtedly a result of their multi-authorship--however all still<br />

reinforce the tendency to use texts in Categories 3 and 4 over 1 and 2, and in<br />

highlighting a perceived “Christian-Gnostic” canon over the bulk of Gnostic<br />

manuscripts. The Messina conference is to be commended for presenting a more<br />

balanced array of source material than is usually the case to this day, almost thirty<br />

years later, and in supplying a detailed index of text citations, a rarity in the field. As<br />

well, this work at least acknowledged the “problem” of Egypt in defining Gnostic<br />

thought, devoting 2 articles, out of a total of 54, to the issue of Egyptian Gnosticism.<br />

The other five representative works are entirely devoid of any analysis of an Egyptian<br />

presence in Gnostic thought, nor do they advance a viable socio-historical model of<br />

any kind for that matter.<br />

The Letter of Peter to Philip (VIII,2)<br />

The Testimony of Truth (IX,3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!