THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
III,3 & V,1), which can be dated to the first century B.C.E. 92<br />
The most interesting<br />
changes, from our perspective, would have occurred among the bilingualised<br />
descendants of the priestly class who were made up in part of educated Greeks who<br />
had crossed the cultural divide. We note in particular Hecataeus (c. 300 B.C.E.), a<br />
pupil of the Skeptic Pyrrhon who, at a very early stage in Ptolemaic rule, provided a<br />
powerful rhetorical impetus in aiding this transculturalisation although he could<br />
hardly be called bilingualised. According to Diodorus, his work On the Egyptians was<br />
divided into four sections: native cosmology and theology; geography of Egypt;<br />
native rulers; and customs. In all this his main interest was in demonstrating the<br />
antiquity and superiority of Egyptian culture and social institutions although the<br />
accuracy of the details he passes along leave much to be desired. Even so, together<br />
with Manetho, Hecataeus was instrumental in early Ptolemaic times in disseminating<br />
Egyptian thought to the Greek world, and in abetting the worldly and comparativist<br />
spirit of the Alexandrian age. 93<br />
This group, existing in close proximity to the library<br />
in Alexandria, 94<br />
would then have facilitated the development of the “internationalist”<br />
perspective imbuing the Gnostic temperament. The later anti-Roman sentiments of the<br />
city would have enhanced their own anti-worldliness, and their anarchic temperament,<br />
fundamentally Egyptian at this point with respect to foreign laws, 95<br />
would have been<br />
in perfect accord with the most anarchic ancient city of learning known in antiquity.<br />
Gnostic libertinism, as well as asceticism, both arose from the bed of anarchist<br />
temperament. 96<br />
We shall have occasion to examine the growing link between<br />
Alexandria and Memphis, in particular the hereditary high-priests there whose lineage<br />
continued unbroken throughout the entire Ptolemaic era, and whose power was everincreasing.<br />
Egyptian in their cultural heritage and ways of thinking, this group would<br />
have been profoundly radicalised by their exposure to the diverse intellectual<br />
developments in Alexandria, in particular Greek philosophical thought. The parallel<br />
Gnostic interaction of Graeco-Egyptian elements resulted in a synergism, a fusion, far<br />
more than a mere accumulation of disparate ideas. On the strength of a dualist<br />
textuality manifest in the magical papyri, a widespread shift to dualistic world-views<br />
92<br />
This point is detailed in Chapter 7.<br />
93<br />
“Manetho testifies to the growth of an international spirit in the Alexandrine age.” Manetho,<br />
vii.<br />
94<br />
Not necessarily in the city although one assumes that this would have naturally formed the<br />
focus here. There is textual evidence to show that antiquarians in other Greek cities on the<br />
Nile built up their libraries through buying, borrowing, and copying as one would expect.<br />
There is one text which illustrates a bookseller’s list of books needed from Alexandria.<br />
Requests here included the complete works of various philosophers, and one interesting<br />
treatise, regrettably lost, entitled On the Uses of Parents Lewis, Life in Egypt Under Roman<br />
Rule, 61.<br />
95<br />
This anarchism was not confined simply to the large cities, but extended into the rural areas<br />
where peasants were driven to flee their homes by Roman taxes and liturgies. The large<br />
scale refusal to work was also a common feature of the times. Ibid., 203-204.<br />
96<br />
Kurt Rudolf, Gnosis, trans. Robert McLachlan Wilson (Reprint;1977, San Francisco:<br />
Harper & Row, 1983), 255: “Evidently libertine and ascetic deductions were drawn from the<br />
beginning, and more or less simultaneously, from the common “anarchistic” deposit, and<br />
were practised with different degrees of intensity.”