06.01.2013 Views

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

views were aired amongst the literati of the fledgling Ptolemaic state. At this time<br />

many of the sacred books of the Orient were finding their way into koine Greek, the<br />

lingua franca of the new empire. The state of flux within the Academy can bee seen<br />

by the shift from Xenocratian dualism to a more implicitly Stoic thrust under his<br />

successor Polemon who headed the Academy following the death of Xenocrates in<br />

314 B.C.E.: one of Polemon’s pupils was the Stoic Zeno. Arcesilaus and, later,<br />

Carneades, instituted the pre-eminence of skeptical method in the New Academy in<br />

the 2nd century B.C.E., and so we have all major philosophical contenders vying for<br />

control of this academic throne in a relatively short period of time. 34<br />

It is at this juncture that Alexandria begins to loom large in the developing<br />

picture of dualist thought. With the fragmentation of Alexander’s empire, the eastern<br />

links with the sources of Greek culture became far more tenuous by the beginning of<br />

the second century B.C.E. Alexandria, ideally suited to become the ancient world’s<br />

intellectual and economic clearing house par excellence, was beginning to manifest<br />

the fruits of a particularly successful result of Alexander’s push for synthesis with<br />

foreign elements The Ptolemaic penchant for research resulted in the establishment of<br />

the famous libraries, and the intellectual research undertaken there also included a<br />

syncretistic assimilation of diverse religious elements, from the Persian Ahura Mazda,<br />

to even a consideration of Buddhist metaphysical claims from the far off realm of<br />

Ashoka. 35<br />

34<br />

This skeptic influence is much reduced in Dillon’s work and mars his overall appreciation of<br />

the period. One must ask why “the skeptical tradition has no place in Middle Platonism,”<br />

(The Middle Platonists, 43 – Dillon himself does not answer this question) when Gnostic<br />

thought, Hermeticism, the Chaldean Oracles, even the “Persian influence,” attain some<br />

measure of attention, be it ever so cursory.<br />

35<br />

It seems certain that Buddhist emissaries from the Indian king Ashoka arrived in Alexandria<br />

around 200 B.C.E., a period of mounting religious excitement in Egypt. See Samuel K.<br />

Eddy, The King is Dead: Studies in the Near Eastern Resistance to Hellenism 334-31 B.C.<br />

(Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1961), 278.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!