06.01.2013 Views

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

all, also separating himself from them. And that which anyone desires he brings<br />

to him so that he might become complete and holy. (NHC IX,3 43.29-44.19) 69<br />

The testimony of Chaeremon, a first-century Egyptian priest, is an important<br />

one to consider alongside Gnostic and magical aspirations. The strong presence of<br />

Egyptian mythological elements in the magical papyri, in particular the identification<br />

of gods and sacred animals, the setting of standards for initiates, and interpretations of<br />

dreams or visions, are all activities which can hardly be considered far-removed from<br />

Chaeremon’s priestly milieu. 70<br />

A case for a fair degree of overlap can certainly be<br />

made and, even acknowledging Chaeremon’s undoubted desire to idealise the<br />

Egyptian priesthood, we cannot but doubt that main gist of his testimony concerning<br />

priestly ascetic practices reflect the actual “pure” life of the priesthood of the time. 71<br />

At the end of a long and very detailed description of the ascetic observances of<br />

Egyptian priests as described by Chaeremon, Porphyry makes the following<br />

interesting comment: “But the rest – the crowd of priests, shrine (?) bearers, temple<br />

wardens, and assistants – practice the same rites of purification for the gods, yet not<br />

with such great accuracy and self-control”. 72<br />

This is precisely the sub-class of the<br />

Egyptian priestly hierarchy where we would expect a number of bilingual Egyptians<br />

with some sort of Greek background to stand as “revisionists”; indeed, it is clear that<br />

Chaeremon wants it understood that this class is less pure than the inner priestly<br />

circle. 73<br />

PGM III.583-610 74<br />

contains a rather eloquent entreaty to god for gnosis and is<br />

to be found in the Hermetic Asclepius in its entirety, also surfacing in the Nag<br />

Hammadi corpus as “The Prayer of Thanksgiving” (NHC VI,7) alongside the other<br />

two Hermetic tractates Asclepius ( NHC VI,8) and The Discourse on the Eighth and<br />

Ninth (NHC VI,6). 75<br />

The rather odd notion of eating gnosis is to be found in both PGM XIII.910<br />

where the seven vowels are licked off a gold lamella, and in Gnostic practice where,<br />

69<br />

Coptic transcription from NHS, vol. XV., 152, 154.<br />

70<br />

A fine example of Egyptian priestly piety is to be found upon the walls of the tomb of<br />

Petosiris, a sage of Hermopolis who lived around 350-330 B.C.E. The inscriptions testifies<br />

that, “Every night the spirit of god was in my soul, and at dawn I did as he willed. I practiced<br />

justice [Ma’at], I detested evil.” Serge Sauneron, The Priests of Ancient Egypt (London:<br />

Evergreen, 1960), 13. Porphyrius (233-304 C.E.), writing on the Egyptian priests in On<br />

Abstinence, described how “they practice simplicity in living and in dress, temperence,<br />

austerity, justice, and non-attachment...” (IV, 6-8).<br />

71<br />

“Nothing impunes the essential authenticity of what survives.” Fowden, The Egyptian<br />

Hermes, 54.<br />

72<br />

Chaeremon, Fragment 10, 17.<br />

73<br />

With respect to the authors of the magical papyri, A.A. Barb makes exactly this point about<br />

revisionary priestly activities in a bilingual context: “The demotic texts can hardly have<br />

been written by anybody but an Egyptian priest or scribe, the Coptic ones were probably a<br />

lucrative sideline of unscrupulous monks.” “Mystery, Myth, and Magic,”160.<br />

74<br />

Betz, The Greek Magical Papyri, 33-34.<br />

75<br />

See Fowden, The Egyptian Hermes, 83.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!