06.01.2013 Views

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plutarch, writing around 118 C.E., objects to Stoic monism, and demonstrates<br />

the stance of a host of Platonist philosophers with rather Gnostic leanings:<br />

We must neither place the origins of the universe in inanimate bodies, as<br />

Democritus and Epicurus do, nor yet postulate one reason and one providence,<br />

dominating and ruling everything, as the creator of characterless matter, as the<br />

Stoics do; for it is impossible, where God is responsible for everything, for<br />

anything evil to come into being, or for anything good to come where God is<br />

responsible for nothing.(De Iside 368B) 70<br />

One feature that is prominent on the Skeptical side of the divide is an implicit<br />

focus upon the individual, male or female. Pyrrhonian Skepticism exhibited a close<br />

link with the Sophistic enlightenment, and with the thought of Protagoras in<br />

particular. 71<br />

To return for a moment to our earlier discussion about the emancipation<br />

of women in Hellenistic times, we can assume that the various modes of Skeptical<br />

thought in Alexandria would have supported women rather than excluding their<br />

participation, involved, as they were, in the repudiation of traditional values: the<br />

connection with the earlier Sophistic Aufklärung has already been noted, and it was<br />

the Sophists who first raised the issue of women’s rights. 72<br />

The rejection by Epicurus<br />

of Stoic doctrines also included the admission of women into the sect as equals. So,<br />

too, the female philosopher Hipparchis lived according to Cynic principles. The<br />

Stoics, for their part, did not posit equality between the sexes and refused to accept<br />

women as rational beings. In opposition to the Skeptics who were undermining the<br />

values of the Classical period, the Stoics, following their founder Zeno (335-263<br />

B.C.E.), were intent upon reinforcing those values, and in particular, in reasserting the<br />

traditional role of motherhood and marriage for women. 73<br />

Stoicism, on the whole,<br />

was a philosophy of social conservatism.<br />

The radical subjectivism of the Sophists proclaimed the relativity of truth, 74<br />

and under the auspices of Pericles in Athens, created a distinct internationalism of<br />

outlook as purveyed by the travelling sophistes. This feature was to become the<br />

hallmark of the later Hellenistic age as it broke out across the Orient under Alexander;<br />

indeed, the young Skeptic Pyrrho travelled with Alexander on his campaigns in the<br />

east. The demurral by Protagoras concerning the existence of the gods finds its more<br />

70<br />

Griffiths, De Iside et Osiride, 188-89.<br />

71<br />

Long, Hellenistic Philosophy, 79.<br />

72<br />

G.B. Kerferd, The Sophistic Movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981),<br />

159: “It is not surprising that the new thinking of the Sophistic movement should lead to the<br />

posing of questions concerning the rights and position of women in Greek societies,”. We<br />

would also note in passing that the first implicit condemnation of slavery in Greek texts<br />

(found nowhere in Plato and Aristotle) appears to be that of Alcidamas, a disciple of the<br />

Sophist Gorgias.<br />

73<br />

Regarding their concern about falling birth-rates in Greek cities, see Pomeroy, Goddesses,<br />

Whores, Wives, and Slaves, 132.<br />

74<br />

See Protagoras’ famous dictum: “Man is the measure of all things: of things that are, that<br />

they are; of things that are not, that they are not” (trans. Wheelwright, The Presocratics,<br />

239).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!