THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
THE EGYPTIAN FOUNDATIONS OF GNOSTIC THOUGHT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
individual involved the “discovery” of women as individuals in power-politics and in<br />
religion. 27<br />
The expression of this sentiment perhaps found its apotheosis in the works<br />
of the epigramist Meleager of Gadara (Jordan, c. 100 B.C.E.), most of whose poems<br />
are about love. In the variegated forms his epigrams take (one hundred have<br />
survived), his love for womanhood attains almost the level of a religious panegyric.<br />
Hellenistic art revealed a new interest in the eroticism of women. In conjunction with<br />
the influence of Ptolemaic royal women, the courtesan class of sophisticated women<br />
also influenced perceptions of women and female sexuality. While a certain frank<br />
libertinism in Ptolemaic times manifested in the Dionysian festivals at Eleusis near<br />
Alexandria perhaps finds its parallel in the rise of the later libertine Gnostic sects, 28<br />
a<br />
more important connection is found simply in a focus upon the individual which<br />
included male and female sexuality. Many Gnostic sects took the crucible of malefemale<br />
sexuality as the most critical component for spiritual salvation. Madeline<br />
Scopello details the similarities between heroines in the Gnostic novel and the<br />
Hellenistic novel, noting that “in the gnostic novels, there is a tension between<br />
prostitution and virginity which is unknown to Hellenistic novels”. 29<br />
A strong<br />
connection is made in this regard with Jewish wisdom literature and her overall<br />
conclusion is that Gnosticism involved cultivated women in its circles, in particular<br />
the courtesan class.<br />
For all this, Alexandria reflected the general widespread decline of Greek<br />
culture in the late Hellenistic age; at least such is the picture drawn by some<br />
Classicists. 30<br />
Putting aside such Hellenocentric optics which sees this Graeco-<br />
Egyptian cultural fusion as a “decline” we now focus upon the Egyptian side of the<br />
cultural equation.<br />
27<br />
superior status of Egyptian women was a widespread historical reality in Egypt: both factors<br />
found their later expression in the Gnostic movement.<br />
Michael Grant, From Alexander to Cleopatra: The Hellenistic World (New York: Charles<br />
Scribner’s Sons, 1982), 204: “The cultural background for this shifting of attitudes was a<br />
tremendous new discovery, strongly reflected both in literature and art, that women were<br />
actually interesting, not merely as remote figures in tragedies, but as real and attractive<br />
persons: and preoccupation with their looks, and with feminine standards of beauty,<br />
increased out of all recognition.”<br />
28<br />
The heresiologist Epiphanius’ testimony overall is rather dubious in its specific details, but<br />
there is no reason to doubt that he had some sort of encounter with “liberal” Egyptian<br />
Gnostic women (Panarion XXV 2,7).<br />
29<br />
Madeline Scopello, “Jewish and Greek Heroines in the Nag Hammadi Library,” in Images<br />
of the Feminine in Gnosticism, 81.<br />
30<br />
The thesis of Fraser, in Ptolemaic Alexandria, is that the “golden age” of Alexandrian<br />
creativity was a product of the Greek immigrés in the 3rd century B.C.E. Following this,<br />
“the immigré was being replaced by an inferior, locally-bred intellectual class,” (717). Yet, it<br />
should be noted, Fraser is largely arguing e silentio (that no great works of Alexandrian<br />
poetry survive from the first and second centuries B.C.E. ergo there were none, for example<br />
[607]). The “revival” (as Fraser phrases it) of certain philosophical schools in the mid-1st<br />
century B.C.E. in Alexandria indicates an obvious continued creativity associated with a<br />
library that remained intact even following the Roman conquest. For a complete refutation<br />
of the traditional view that Caesar inadvertently burned a substantial portion of the library in<br />
Alexandria, see Luciano Canfora, The Vanished Library (Berkeley and Los Angeles:<br />
University of California Press, 1987), 81-82.