28.01.2013 Views

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 8. X-ray images<br />

By placing a different section of the PMMA wedge next to the Al sheet, the contrast in<br />

the phantom can be adjusted. Note that because of the similar absorption properties of<br />

Al and PMMA to human tissue, this selection of the absorber materials simulates a thin<br />

bone (Al) placed next to a thicker muscle (PMMA).<br />

First of all the number of photons per second, the integrator current and the absorbed<br />

spectrum behind 1 mm Al and 1 mm to 10 mm PMMA were simulated. The impinging<br />

X-ray spectrum in the simulation was chosen such that it corresponds to the spectrum of<br />

the Hamamatsu X-ray tube at 90 kVp, including the additional low energy filter consisting<br />

of 1 mm of Al. From these simulation data, the image contrast C can be calculated<br />

according to the following definition:<br />

C = AP MMA − AAl<br />

AP MMA + AAl<br />

(8.1)<br />

The variables AP MMA and AAl represent the signal amplitudes behind the PMMA wedge<br />

and the Al sheet. Fig. 8.5 shows the resulting simulated contrasts. It is evident that<br />

the contrast in both counter and integrator has a minimum around (5.5 - 6.0) mm. This<br />

is because at approximately 5.8 mm PMMA thickness the integrator measures the same<br />

currents behind the PMMA and Al absorbers. At roughly 6 mm PMMA thickness the<br />

contrast in the counter vanishes as both absorbers show the same number of photons per<br />

second.<br />

Apart from these two graphs, the figure also contains two simulations of the contrast based<br />

on the average photon energy. In the simulation labeled ”Avg. energy - Int >10 keV -<br />

Cnt >10 keV ” the absorption spectrum above 10 keV was used to calculate the average<br />

photon energies. This corresponds to the measurements presented in section 7.3, i.e. a<br />

C o n tr a s t<br />

0 .1 2<br />

0 .1 0<br />

0 .0 8<br />

0 .0 6<br />

0 .0 4<br />

0 .0 2<br />

0 .0 0<br />

In te g ra to r (A )<br />

C o u n te r > 1 0 k e V (B )<br />

A v g . e n e rg y - In t > 1 0 k e V - C n t > 1 0 k e V (C )<br />

A v g . e n e rg y - In t > 0 k e V - C n t > 1 0 k e V (D )<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0<br />

P M M A th ic k n e s s [m m ]<br />

Fig. 8.5: Simulated image contrast in a low contrast PMMA-Al phantom. The phantom<br />

consists of a 1 mm thick Al sheet placed next to a wedge-shaped PMMA absorber with<br />

thicknesses between 1 mm and 10 mm. The average photon energy contrast was calculated<br />

using two different approaches. Once it was derived from the simulated photon spectra with<br />

a 10 keV lower threshold to exclude low energy charge sharing hits. The second curve was<br />

calculated according to (7.6). At a PMMA thickness of approximately 6 mm the average<br />

photon energy measurement should offer a better contrast than the counter or the integrator<br />

measurements.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!