28.01.2013 Views

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

UNIVERSIT . . AT BONN Physikalisches Institut - Prof. Dr. Norbert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5. Direct converting sensor materials 21<br />

signals i(t), where Q0 is the total generated charge, which is known from the energy of<br />

the impinging α-particles.<br />

� t ′<br />

Q(t ′ ) =<br />

0<br />

i(t)dt = Q0<br />

D · (x(t′ ) − x(0)) (2.19)<br />

⇒ x(t ′ ) = Q(t′ ) · D<br />

− x(0) (2.20)<br />

Q0<br />

In combination with (2.11), these equations yield a position-dependent description of the<br />

electric field in a single channel detector.<br />

E(x(t)) =<br />

i(x(t)) · D<br />

Q0 · µ<br />

(2.21)<br />

The electric field in the Si p-n diode shows the expected linear decrease, which furthermore<br />

agrees nicely with a theoretical calculation of the field profile at room temperature and<br />

96 V depletion voltage [39].<br />

Based on this validation of the experimental method the electric field profiles in CdTe and<br />

CdZnTe were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 2.14, CdZnTe has a field profile, which can be,<br />

over a large section of the detector, approximated by a linear decrease in field strength<br />

from cathode to anode. This infers that these detectors contain a homogeneous, positive<br />

space charge, which is most likely caused by trapped holes.<br />

A similar situation is found for the 500 µm thick CdTe sensors. However, here the limitations<br />

of the TCT method become obvious as the the electric field profile close to the<br />

cathode shows an artificial breakdown. This artifact is a result of a delay in the charge<br />

carrier movement right after their generation. The dense electron-hole cloud partially<br />

shields the sensor’s electric field [2] thus influencing the charge carrier velocities and as<br />

a consequence also the reconstruction of the field profile. This measurement induced origin<br />

of the breakdown is supported by a recent study [42], in which electric field profiles<br />

obtained with the TCT method were compared to measurements based on the Pockel’s<br />

effect. While the TCT measurements yield field breakdowns similar to the ones shown<br />

in Fig. 2.14, the transmission of polarized laser light through the crystals reveals no such<br />

effects.<br />

In summary, the electric field in CdTe as well as CdZnTe deviates from the idealized model<br />

of a solid state ionization chamber with a constant electric field. To be precise, both materials<br />

show a significant internal space charge and an accompanying non-constant electric<br />

field.<br />

Polarization<br />

In general polarization describes the decrease of a sensor’s detection efficiency due to the<br />

accumulation of space charges inside the detector volume. A detailed model of this effect<br />

can be found in [43] from which Fig. 2.15 was taken. The figure shows that the trapped<br />

hole charge as a function of the position inside the detector follows the intensity profile<br />

of the impinging X-ray beam. In that case the large space charge close to the cathode<br />

causes a sharp drop in the electric field and thereby introduces a zero field pinch point.<br />

This weak field region greatly hinders the charge carrier movement and leads to electronhole<br />

recombination, i.e. an additional charge loss or a reduced charge collection efficiency.<br />

Previous measurements [2,44] have shown that these polarization effects are prominent in<br />

CdTe sensors with Schottky contacts.<br />

In addition to this, recent measurements have also shown lateral polarization in CdZnTe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!