01.02.2013 Views

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56j 4 A Review on the Taxonomy and Possible Screening Traits of <strong>Plant</strong> Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria<br />

in two categories: extracellular PGPR (e-PGPR) and intracellular PGPR (i-PGPR).<br />

The first category, e-PGPR, includes bacteria existing in the rhizosphere, on the<br />

rhizoplane or in the spaces between cells of the root cortex, stimulating plant<br />

growth <strong>by</strong> producing phytohormones, improving plant disease resistance or improving<br />

mobilization of soil nutrients. Picard and Bosco [6] state that noninvasive<br />

rhizobacteria (e-PGPR) represent the most common plant–microbe interactions in<br />

healthy plants.<br />

i-PGPR are those bacteria that exist inside root cells, generally in specialized<br />

nodular structures where they fix nitrogen. The latter, i-PGPR, are therefore those<br />

bacteria that are also known as rhizobia, a name derived from the genus Rhizobium<br />

[7] and refer to bacteria that induce nodules in legumes and fix atmospheric<br />

nitrogen in symbiosis with them. However, bacteria showing this ability also<br />

belong to genera other than Rhizobium, thus the term legume-nodulating bacteria<br />

(LNB) has been proposed [7]. Notwithstanding, LNB are not the only bacteria able<br />

to fix atmospheric nitrogen in symbiosis as can be seen in Table 4.1.<br />

4.2<br />

Taxonomy of PGPR<br />

The term taxonomy is defined as the science dedicated to the study of relationships<br />

among organisms and has to do with their classification, nomenclature and identification.<br />

The accurate comparison of organisms at different times <strong>by</strong> different<br />

scientists depends on a reliable taxonomic system that allows a precise classification<br />

of the organisms under study.<br />

Since its beginnings in the late nineteenth century, bacterial taxonomy relied<br />

on phenotypic traits such as cell and colonial morphologies and biochemical,<br />

physiological and immunological tests. Taxonomy was revolutionized thanks to<br />

the discovery of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique in 1983. Since<br />

then, the search for a trait that would be in congruence with the evolutionary<br />

divergence of organisms, that is their phylogeny, was mandatory. This trait was<br />

found in the ribosomal RNA [25], a molecule used <strong>by</strong> all living cells. The gene<br />

sequences of the 16S subunit of the ribosomal RNA have been used since to<br />

compare evolutionary similitudes among strains. At present, and <strong>by</strong> correlation<br />

with experimental data obtained in the comparison of total genomic DNA (DNA–<br />

DNA hybridization), it is proposed that a similarity below 98.7–99% on an<br />

UPGMA analysis of the 16S rDNA sequences of two bacterial strains is sufficient<br />

to consider them as belonging to different species [26]. Notwithstanding, it is<br />

possible that two strains showing 16S rDNA sequence similarities above the<br />

98.7% threshold may represent two different species [27]. In these cases, total<br />

genome DNA–DNA hybridizations must be performed and those strains for<br />

which similarities are below 70% are considered to belong to different species.<br />

In this context, and given the fact that no taxonomic technique is absolutely<br />

accurate, the use of a polyphasic approach to taxonomy [28] was implemented<br />

in bacterial taxonomy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!