01.02.2013 Views

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

Page 2 Plant-Bacteria Interactions Edited by Iqbal Ahmad, John ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This appears to be a very promising approach toward preventing AHL signaling in<br />

plant-associated/pathogenic bacteria compared to the GM plant approach.<br />

7.7<br />

Conclusion<br />

It is now clear that QS is a widespread gene-regulatory mechanism among Gramnegativebacteria.However,QSinGram-positivebacteriahasnowbeenexploredinfew<br />

cases. In plant-associated bacteria, including pathogenic ones, a variety of traits are<br />

under QS control. However, many traits are still to be reconfirmed. Extensive informationonthechemicalstructureandfunctionofQSmoleculesamongGram-negative<br />

bacteria is now available. The signal molecules exhibit structural diversity and most<br />

common signal molecules are AHLs. Interestingly, QS has been identified as a novel<br />

target to influence the bacterial virulence and pathogenicity. The natural and synthetic<br />

compounds having QS-interfering properties have been identified. It is conceivable<br />

that quorum-sensing inhibition may represent a natural, widespread, antimicrobial<br />

strategy utilized <strong>by</strong> plants and other organisms with significant impact on biofilm<br />

formation. The QS may be targeted in different way. The creation of transgenic plants<br />

that express bacterial QS genes is yet another interesting strategy to interfere with<br />

bacterial behavior and disease control. <strong>Plant</strong>s are now known to harbor anti-QS activity/metabolites<br />

that could disrupt the QS-controlled pathogenicity of bacteria and<br />

manipulate plant–microbe interactions to obtain improved crop production. More<br />

fundamental research on this mechanism and the presence of multiple QS systems<br />

and their interaction with each other in a single bacterial species remains to be conducted.<br />

Now, with the advanced understanding of QS systems operating in various<br />

microorganisms and methods for characterization of QS molecules and existence of<br />

bacteria-to-bacteria and bacteria-to-plant interactions, we are able to target QS-regulated<br />

functions <strong>by</strong> either (i) degrading or inhibiting QS signals, signal–cell receptors.<br />

However, many questions remain to be solved as an in-depth knowledge of the<br />

AHL signaling system, which is common in a number of important plant-associated<br />

bacteria, is needed. It is possible that gross disruption of AHL-based communication<br />

in the rhizosphere may adversely affect the colonization or behavior of a number of<br />

important growth-promoting or biocontrol species [90]. Many more interesting<br />

phenomena between mixed microbial communities and their interactions with<br />

plants are to be explored.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

Acknowledgmentsj147<br />

We are thankful to Professor Robert J.C. McLean (USA) for his encouragement<br />

and support to work on QS and Professor <strong>John</strong> Pitchel (USA) and Dr S. Hayat (AMU,<br />

Aligarh) for critical input and preparation of this manuscript. Finally, the cooperation<br />

received <strong>by</strong> students, especially <strong>by</strong> Mohd Imran and Miss Sameena Hasan,<br />

(AMU) are thankfully acknowledged.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!