06.02.2013 Views

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vandermeulen, Dirk<br />

Suetens, Paul, K.U.Leuven<br />

The recognition of faces under varying expressions is one of the current challenges in the face recognition community. In<br />

this paper, we propose a method fusing different complementary approaches each dealing with expression variations. The<br />

first approach uses an isometric deformation model and is based on the largest singular values of the geodesic distance<br />

matrix as an expression-invariant shape descriptor. The second approach performs recognition on the more rigid parts of<br />

the face that are less affected by expression variations. Several fusion techniques are examined for combining the approaches.<br />

The presented method is validated on a subset of 900 faces of the BU-3DFE face database resulting in an equal<br />

error rate of 5.85% for the verification scenario and a rank 1 recognition rate of 94.48% for the identification scenario<br />

using the sum rule as fusion technique. This result outperforms other 3D expression-invariant face recognition methods<br />

on the same database.<br />

09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.14<br />

Towards a Best Linear Combination for Multimodal Biometric Fusion<br />

Chia, Chaw, Chia, Chaw, Nottingham Trent Univ.<br />

Sherkat, Nasser, Nottingham Trent Univ.<br />

Nolle, Lars, Nottingham Trent Univ.<br />

Owing to effectiveness and ease of implementation Sum rule has been widely applied in the biometric research field. Different<br />

matcher information has been used as weighting parameters in the weighted Sum rule. In this work, a new parameter<br />

has been devised in reducing the genuine/imposter distribution overlap. It is shown that the overlap region width has the<br />

best generalization performance as the weighting parameter amongst other commonly used matcher information. Furthermore,<br />

it is illustrated that the equal weighted Sum rule can generally perform better than the Equal Error Rate and d-prime<br />

weighted Sum rule. The publicly available databases: the NIST-BSSR1 multimodal biometric and Xm2vts score sets have<br />

been used.<br />

09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.15<br />

Slap Fingerprint Segmentation for Live-Scan Devices and Ten-Print Cards<br />

Zhang, Yongliang, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology<br />

Xiao, Gang, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology<br />

Li, Yanmiao, Jiaotong Univ. Dalian<br />

Wu, Hongtao, Hebei Univ. of Tech.<br />

Huang, Yaping, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology<br />

Presented here is a highly accurate and computationally efficient algorithm suitable for slap fingerprint segmentation. The<br />

main advantages of this algorithm are as follows: 1)three-order cumulant is used to roughly segment the foreground; 2)frequency<br />

domain analysis is carried out in local areas to do binarization and fine segmentation; 3)cumulative sum analysis<br />

is applied to extract the knuckle lines; 4)two shape features of the ellipse are adapted to calculate the confidence of each<br />

fingertip candidate. Experimental results show that the algorithm has the characteristic of more robustness against noise<br />

and superior precision, not only for live-scan four finger slaps but also for ten-print-card five finger slaps.<br />

09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.16<br />

A Metric of Information Gained through Biometric Systems<br />

Takahashi, Kenta, Hitachi Ltd.<br />

Murakami, Takao, Hitachi Ltd.<br />

We propose a metric of information gained through biometric matching systems. Firstly, we discuss how the information<br />

about the identity of a person is derived from biometric samples through a biometric system, and define the “biometric<br />

system entropy” or BSE. Then we prove that the BSE can be approximated asymptotically by the Kullback-Leibler divergence<br />

D(f_G(x) || f_I(x)) where f_G(x), f_I(x) are PDFs of matching scores between samples from an individuals and<br />

among population. We also discuss how to evaluate D(f_G || f_I) of a biometric system and show a numerical example of<br />

face and fingerprint matching systems.<br />

- 98 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!