06.02.2013 Views

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

09:40-10:00, Paper TuAT5.3<br />

Adding Affine Invariant Geometric Constraint for Partial-Duplicate Image Retrieval<br />

Wu, Zhipeng, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

Xu, Qianqian, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

Jiang, Shuqiang, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

Huang, Qingming, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

Cui, Peng, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

Li, Liang, Chinese Acad. of Sciences<br />

The spring up of large numbers of partial-duplicate images on the internet brings a new challenge to the image retrieval<br />

systems. Rather than taking the image as a whole, researchers bundle the local visual words by MSER detector into groups<br />

and add simple relative ordering geometric constraint to the bundles. Experiments show that bundled features become<br />

much more discriminative than single feature. However, the weak geometric constraint is only applicable when there is<br />

no significant rotation between duplicate images and it couldn’t handle the circumstances of image flip or large rotation<br />

transformation. In this paper, we improve the bundled features with an affine invariant geometric constraint. It employs<br />

area ratio invariance property of affine transformation to build the affine invariant matrix for bundled visual words. Such<br />

affine invariant geometric constraint can cope well with flip, rotation or other transformations. Experimental results on<br />

the internet partial-duplicate image database verify the promotion it brings to the original bundled features approach. Since<br />

currently there is no available public corpus for partial-duplicate image retrieval, we also publish our dataset for future<br />

studies.<br />

10:00-10:20, Paper TuAT5.4<br />

Outlier-Resistant Dissimilarity Measure for Feature-Based Image Matching<br />

Palenichka, Roman, Univ. of Quebec<br />

Lakhssassi, Ahmed, Univ. of Quebec<br />

Zaremba, Marek, Univ. of Quebec<br />

A novel dissimilarity measure is proposed to perform correspondence image matching for object recognition, image registration<br />

and content-based image retrieval. This is a feature-based matching, which supposes image representation (object<br />

description) in the form of a set of multi-location descriptor vectors. The proposed measure called intersection matching<br />

distance eliminates outlies (false or missing feature points) while transformation-invariantly matching two sets of descriptor<br />

vectors. A block-subdivision algorithm for time-efficient image matching is also described.<br />

10:20-10:40, Paper TuAT5.5<br />

The University of Surrey Visual Concept Detection System at ImageCLEF@<strong>ICPR</strong>: Working Notes<br />

Tahir, Muhammad Atif, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Fei, Yan, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Barnard, Mark, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Awais, Muhammad, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Mikolajczyk, Krystian, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Kittler, Josef, Univ. of Surrey<br />

Visual concept detection is one of the most important tasks in image and video indexing. This paper describes our system<br />

in the Image CLEF@<strong>ICPR</strong> Visual Concept Detection Task which ranked {\it first} for large-scale visual concept detection<br />

tasks in terms of Equal Error Rate (EER) and Area under Curve (AUC) and ranked {\it third} in terms of hierarchical<br />

measure. The presented approach involves state-of-the-art local descriptor computation, vector quantisation via clustering,<br />

structured scene or object representation via localised histograms of vector codes, similarity measure for kernel construction<br />

and classifier learning. The main novelty is the classifier-level and kernel-level fusion using Kernel Discriminant Analysis<br />

with RBF/Power Chi-Squared kernels obtained from various image descriptors. For 32 out of 53 individual concepts, we<br />

obtain the best performance of all 12 submissions to this task.<br />

- 77 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!