Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010
Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010
Abstract book (pdf) - ICPR 2010
- TAGS
- abstract
- icpr
- icpr2010.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.24<br />
Attacking Iris Recognition: An Efficient Hill-Climbing Technique<br />
Rathgeb, Christian, Univ. of Salzburg<br />
Uhl, Andreas, Univ. of Salzburg<br />
In this paper we propose a modified hill-climbing attack to iris biometric systems. Applying our technique we are able to<br />
effectively gain access to iris biometric systems at very low effort. Furthermore, we demonstrate that reconstructing approximations<br />
of original iris images is highly non-trivial.<br />
09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.25<br />
Face Recognition at-a-Distance using Texture, Dense- and Sparse-Stereo Reconstruction<br />
Rara, Ham, CVIP Lab. Univ. of Louisville<br />
Ali, Asem, Univ. of Louisville<br />
Elhabian, Shireen, Univ. of Louisville<br />
Starr, Thomas, Univ. of Louisville<br />
Farag, Aly A., Univ. of Louisville<br />
This paper introduces a framework for long-distance face recognition using dense and sparse stereo reconstruction, with<br />
texture of the facial region. Two methods to determine correspondences of the stereo pair are used in this paper: (a) dense<br />
global stereo-matching using maximum-a-posteriori Markov Random Fields (MAP-MRF) algorithms and (b) Active Appearance<br />
Model (AAM) fitting of both images of the stereo pair and using the fitted AAM mesh as the sparse correspondences.<br />
Experiments are performed using combinations of different features extracted from the dense and sparse<br />
reconstructions, as well as facial texture. The cumulative rank curves (CMC), which are generated using the proposed<br />
framework, confirms the feasibility of the proposed work for long distance recognition of human faces.<br />
09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.26<br />
Automatic Asymmetric 3D-2D Face Recognition<br />
Huang, Di, Ec. Centrale de Lyon<br />
Ardabilian, Mohsen, Ec. Centrale de Lyon<br />
Wang, Yunhong, Beihang Univ.<br />
Chen, Liming, Ec. Centrale de Lyon<br />
3D Face recognition has been considered as a major solution to deal with unsolved issues of reliable 2D face recognition<br />
in recent years, i.e. lighting and pose variations. However, 3D techniques are currently limited by their high registration<br />
and computation cost. In this paper, an asymmetric 3D-2D face recognition method is presented, enrolling in textured 3D<br />
whilst performing automatic identification using only 2D facial images. The goal is to limit the use of 3D data to where it<br />
really helps to improve face recognition accuracy. The proposed approach contains two separate matching steps: Sparse<br />
Representation Classifier (SRC) is applied to 2D-2D matching, while Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is exploited<br />
to learn the mapping between range LBP faces (3D) and texture LBP faces (2D). Both matching scores are combined for<br />
the final decision. Moreover, we propose a new preprocessing pipeline to enhance robustness to lighting and pose effects.<br />
The proposed method achieves better experimental results in the FRGC v2.0 dataset than 2D methods do, but avoiding<br />
the cost and inconvenience of data acquisition and computation of 3D approaches.<br />
09:00-11:10, Paper TuAT9.27<br />
Model and Score Adaptation for Biometric Systems: Coping with Device Interoperability and Changing Acquisition<br />
Conditions<br />
Poh, Norman, Univ. of Surrey<br />
Kittler, Josef, Univ. of Surrey<br />
Marcel, Sebastien, IDIAP Res. Inst. EPFL<br />
Matrouf, Driss, Univ. d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse<br />
Bonastre, Jean-Francois, Univ. d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse<br />
The performance of biometric systems can be significantly affected by changes in signal quality. In this paper, two types<br />
of changes are considered: change in acquisition environment and in sensing devices. We investigated three solutions: (I)<br />
model-level adaptation, (ii) score-level adaptation (normalisation), and (iii) the combination of the two, called compound<br />
adaptation. In order to cope with the above changing conditions, the model-level adaptation attempts to update the param-<br />
- 101 -