13.02.2013 Views

Mechanics of Fluids

Mechanics of Fluids

Mechanics of Fluids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254 Flow and losses in pipes and fittings<br />

appreciably affect the value <strong>of</strong> f in large pipes is waviness <strong>of</strong> the surface,<br />

that is, the presence <strong>of</strong> transverse ridges on a larger scale than the normal<br />

roughness.<br />

These and other arguments indicate that Moody’s diagram is at best an<br />

approximation. In addition, the roughness <strong>of</strong> many materials is very variable<br />

and it frequently increases with age, particularly if the surface becomes dirty<br />

or corroded. (In pipes <strong>of</strong> small diameter the effective bore may be altered by<br />

dirt and corrosion.) Accurate prediction <strong>of</strong> friction losses is thus difficult to<br />

achieve.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> empirical formulae have been put forward to describe certain<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> Fig. 7.4. There is, for example, Blasisus’s formula for the turbulent<br />

smooth-pipe curve:<br />

f = 0.079(Re) −1/4<br />

(7.5)<br />

which agrees closely with experimental results for Reynolds number between<br />

4000 and 105 . Many formulae have been proposed so that f can be calculated<br />

directly for the entire range <strong>of</strong> k/d and Re. The best yet produced is probably<br />

that by S. E. Haaland<br />

�<br />

1<br />

6.9<br />

� =−3.6 log10 f Re +<br />

� � �<br />

1.11<br />

k<br />

3.71d<br />

It combines reasonable simplicity with acceptable accuracy (within about<br />

1.5%) and is useful if an algebraic expression is required.<br />

A fuller discussion <strong>of</strong> friction factor relationships for flow in smooth or<br />

rough pipes is to be found in Section 8.12.<br />

A common practical problem is to determine the head lost to friction for a<br />

given mean velocity in a pipe <strong>of</strong> given diameter. From these data the appropriate<br />

Reynolds number may be calculated and a value <strong>of</strong> f taken from<br />

Fig. 7.4. The head loss is then determined from eqn 7.1. If, however, the<br />

velocity or the diameter is unknown the Reynolds number is also unknown.<br />

Nevertheless, since the value <strong>of</strong> f changes but slowly with Reynolds number,<br />

assumed values <strong>of</strong> Re and f may be used for a first trial. Better approximations<br />

to these values can then be obtained from the trial results. This iterative<br />

approach lends itself to solutions using the computer.<br />

For restricted ranges <strong>of</strong> Reynolds number and pipe diameter, f is sufficiently<br />

constant for tables <strong>of</strong> values to have been compiled for use in<br />

engineering calculations. Although the use <strong>of</strong> such values <strong>of</strong>ten allows problems<br />

to be solved more simply, limitation <strong>of</strong> the values to a particular range<br />

<strong>of</strong> conditions should never be forgotten.<br />

The graph <strong>of</strong> f as a function <strong>of</strong> Re and k/d is a convenient presentation<br />

when it is desired to calculate head loss or pressure drop. In the case <strong>of</strong> inverse<br />

problems, in which the head loss is known and it is required to evaluate some<br />

other variable, such as pipe diameter, flow velocity or volume flow rate<br />

this type <strong>of</strong> presentation has its drawbacks. The methods <strong>of</strong> dimensional<br />

analysis provide the answer to these difficulties. Alternative dimensionless<br />

groups can be derived which allow the inverse problems to be solved in a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!