13.02.2013 Views

Mechanics of Fluids

Mechanics of Fluids

Mechanics of Fluids

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

656 Fluid machines<br />

than unity and falls <strong>of</strong>f rapidly as the speed ratio approaches unity. This<br />

characteristic is a serious disadvantage in many applications.<br />

One way <strong>of</strong> meeting the difficulty is this. At the higher speed ratios T2/T1<br />

falls below unity, that is, the reaction torque becomes negative (eqn 13.31).<br />

If a ratchet device is fitted whereby the reaction member may rotate, but only<br />

in a forward direction, the reaction blades automatically begin to turn as the<br />

reaction torque changes sign. The entire device then behaves as a simple<br />

coupling; the efficiency is equal to the speed ratio, and the torque ratio<br />

remains at unity. Thus a combination <strong>of</strong> torque converter and coupling is<br />

obtained in which each is used in its best operating range. An alternative<br />

solution is to substitute a direct drive when the speed ratio reaches a certain<br />

value; this is achieved by a clutch that is required to slip until the speeds <strong>of</strong><br />

the primary and secondary rotors are equalized.<br />

The flow in torque converters may be studied by the use <strong>of</strong> the fundamental<br />

relations derived for pumps and turbines. For further details, however, more<br />

specialist works should be consulted.<br />

13.6 THE EFFECT OF SIZE ON THE EFFICIENCY OF FLUID<br />

MACHINES<br />

If the requirements laid down in Section 13.3.5 were exactly satisfied,<br />

all fluid machines in the same homologous series would have the<br />

same efficiency when running at dynamically similar conditions. In practice,<br />

however, small machines, no matter how well designed and made,<br />

have lower efficiencies than larger members <strong>of</strong> the same homologous<br />

series.<br />

The main reason is that exact geometric similarity cannot be achieved. The<br />

actual roughness <strong>of</strong> surfaces in a small machine may differ little from that in<br />

a large machine; thus the relative roughness in the small machine is greater<br />

and the frictional losses are consequently more significant. The blades in the<br />

smaller machine may be relatively thicker. Clearances in the small machine<br />

cannot be reduced in the same proportion as other length measurements, and<br />

so leakage losses are relatively higher. Further departures from strict geometric<br />

similarity may be found in commercial pump impellers <strong>of</strong> nominally<br />

the same design.<br />

All these effects reduce the hydraulic efficiency <strong>of</strong> the small machine.<br />

The overall efficiency is <strong>of</strong>ten reduced still further because the mechanical<br />

losses such as bearing friction and windage are relatively larger for the small<br />

machine.<br />

Not all types <strong>of</strong> machine are affected similarly by changes <strong>of</strong> size. For<br />

example, a Pelton wheel does not suffer from leakage losses, so the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

a reduction in size for such a machine is somewhat less than for a reaction<br />

machine.<br />

When the results <strong>of</strong> tests on model machines are scaled up for the prototype<br />

machine, empirical formulae are used to account for these differences <strong>of</strong><br />

efficiency. A simple formula is that proposed by L. F. Moody (1880–1953)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!