Archivo PDF (1,90 MB) - AEC_____Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Archivo PDF (1,90 MB) - AEC_____Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Archivo PDF (1,90 MB) - AEC_____Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Executive summary<br />
Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Sugarbaker procedure in<br />
the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal cancer,<br />
ovarian cancer, pseudomyxoma peritonei, abdominal sarcoma, malignant<br />
mesothelioma and gastric cancer.<br />
Type of intervention: Maximal cytoreductive surgery and concomitant perioperative<br />
intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without hyperthermia<br />
(Sugarbaker procedure), compared with conventional treatment.<br />
Study <strong>de</strong>sign: Global systematic review (overview).<br />
Methodology: Bibliographic search of the most recent systematic reviews, and<br />
the studies that update them. Sources searched were MEDLINE (accessed<br />
through PubMed), E<strong>MB</strong>ASE (accessed through Ovid) and CENTRAL, up to<br />
year 2007. Assessment of methodological quality and level of evi<strong>de</strong>nce of the<br />
i<strong>de</strong>ntified systematic reviews (AMSTAR tool), clinical trials and case series<br />
(SIGN scale). Description of study results.<br />
Results: 1.619 publications were i<strong>de</strong>ntified, 43 of whom verified the overview<br />
inclusion criteria. There is evi<strong>de</strong>nce from randomized clinical trials proving<br />
that the Sugarbaker procedure is superior to conventional treatment in<br />
terms of survival, for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal or<br />
gastric cancer. Evi<strong>de</strong>nce of the intervention efficacy for peritoneal carcinomatosis<br />
secondary to ovarian cancer, pseudomyxoma peritonei or malignant<br />
peritoneal mesothelioma emerges from uncontrolled case series and is<br />
inconclusive. A small randomized trial in peritoneal sarcomatosis failed to<br />
show a benefit of the Sugarbaker procedure. There are little data available<br />
on quality of life and the results are difficult to assess.<br />
Conclusions: To obtain a <strong>de</strong>eper un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of some important therapeutic<br />
issues related to carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal and gastric<br />
cancer, and to assess the efficacy of the Sugarbaker procedure in the rest of<br />
conditions, international multicentric randomized clinical trials with a<strong>de</strong>quate<br />
sample size are nee<strong>de</strong>d.<br />
Key points<br />
• Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a severe clinical condition that is being progressively<br />
treated in specialized hospitals in many countries through a<br />
combination of maximal cytoreductive surgery and concomitant periop-<br />
RevisiÓn sistemÁtica <strong>de</strong>l tRatamiento combinado multidisciplinaR<br />
en las enfeRmeda<strong>de</strong>s malignas <strong>de</strong>l peRitoneo 15