12.05.2013 Views

LyCE Estudios - Facultad de Filosofía y Letras - Universidad ...

LyCE Estudios - Facultad de Filosofía y Letras - Universidad ...

LyCE Estudios - Facultad de Filosofía y Letras - Universidad ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LyCE</strong> <strong>Estudios</strong> 15 (2012)<br />

45<br />

newspaper?), and therefore, stu<strong>de</strong>nts might not know how<br />

informal or technical the review should be. This has a direct<br />

impact on the way stu<strong>de</strong>nts then write the review, since their<br />

linguistic choices might not be very appropriate, affecting the<br />

<strong>de</strong>sired effect they want to cause.<br />

The sample texts inclu<strong>de</strong>d in textbooks (differently from most<br />

authentic reviews) unfold very neatly toward the Final evaluation<br />

and Recommendation. In other words, the generic structure is<br />

more uniform and regular than what we have observed in<br />

authentic texts. Therefore, boundaries between one stage and<br />

the next appear to be more easily i<strong>de</strong>ntifiable. This possible<br />

simplification makes them very adaptable, even to the more<br />

elementary levels of instruction.<br />

Most movie reviews inclu<strong>de</strong>d in EFL textbooks seem to have the<br />

same overall function as authentic texts. However, the way in<br />

which this general function is fulfilled in the texts seems to be<br />

different. Authentic texts have a more flexible, less linear way of<br />

unfolding towards the achievement of their purpose. They fulfill<br />

the functions of the text less neatly, in stages with boundaries<br />

that are fuzzier and in a more variable or<strong>de</strong>r. In contrast, sample<br />

texts found in EFL textbooks tend to fulfill the same functions<br />

(they inclu<strong>de</strong> film data, a summary, general and specific<br />

evaluations of different aspects of the movie), yet they seem to<br />

be more carefully put together and to unfold more smoothly<br />

towards the recommendation that the reviewer wishes to make.<br />

Movie reviews found in textbooks typically end with a clear, quite<br />

explicit Recommendation, whereas in authentic texts this stage<br />

tends to be more implicitly expressed. It may, actually, be<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red an unnecessary step since the language used<br />

throughout the review already helps the rea<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> whether to<br />

watch the movie or not. In textbooks, however, this final step<br />

appears explicitly as a separate stage. This could be related to<br />

an interest in having stu<strong>de</strong>nts practice resources that express<br />

exhortation, or to the need to make sure that the function of<br />

recommending is clearly expressed, rather than relying only on<br />

implicit meanings expressed in the rest of the text.<br />

Since the purpose of this genre is to give our opinion about a<br />

movie in support of a recommendation that we make so that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!