anale 8.pdf - Institutul National de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

. FonOR COLAB.exclusă posibilitatea de a îrnbina producţia 111are de tuberculi cu conţinutulridicat de arnidon, dar necesită material iniţial testat şi volummai lnare de serl1linceri.VARIABILITY OF SOME CHARACTERS IN POTATO HYBRIDVEGETATIVE POPULATIONS AND THEIR SUITABILITY 1'0SELECTION UNDER DIFFERENT PEDOCLTIVIATIC CONDI'TIONSSUMMARYIn four loc.alities (Brnşov, Suceava, Cluj-Napoc.a, Ştegmeşti-Argeş) anel two years(1969-1970) nine hybrid vegetative populations were analyzed for phenotypicalvariability of tuber yielcl, tubel' number and starch content. The large variabilit,Ymay be due more ar less to the effect of environmental f(1ctors. The values of thecorrelation coefficients between years for each character (table 6) express a strongrepeatability in phenotipical terms, so that a pozitive effect of the selection isavailable. The tube.r yield is positively correlateel \vith the tuber number, but negatively(significant1y only one year) with the stareh content; no correlation isbetween the number of tubers and the stareh content (table 7). A good se1ectioninvolves different selection 1evels depending on locality : a higher 1eve1 for tuberyi'eld and lower for starch content undeI' irrigation in Stefăne,,;;ti, a I'ather highleve1 but similar for number of tubers and starch content in Braşov and Suceava.DIE VARIABILITĂT EINIGER MERKMALE IN VEGETATIVENHYBHIDE POPULATIONEN BEI KARTOFFELN UND IHRE EIGNUNGFUR DIE SELEKTION UNTER UNTERSCHIEDLICHEN BODEN -UND KLIMABEDINGUNGENZUS:AMMENFASSUNGUnt.er elen pedoklimatischen Bedingungen aus Braşov,Suceava,'Cluj-Napoca l.lndŞtefăneşti/Argeş in den Jahren 1969-1970 wurden 9 vegetative Hybridpopl.llationenhinsichtlich der Variabilităt der phenotypisehen Al.lsprăgung des KnollenertI1ages,der Knollenzah1 l.lnd des SUirke gehaltes, wie auch die Eignung fUr die Se~ektjondieser Merkmale untersucht. Es wurae eine grosse variabilităt festgestellt, welcheauf die AktJon der genetischen FaktoreI). wie ,anch aui clie Umweltfaktoren zuruckzufilhf1enist, die grosser odeI' kleiner sincl, in Abhăngigkeit cler untersuchtenMerkma1en. Die ""Verte der Kore1ations Koefizicntcn der verschiedcnen Merkmalcnzwischen den Jahrcn (Tabelle G), beweisen cine grosse Wicdcrholungsrnog1ichkeitder phenotypischen Auspregung der Merkmale und als in Folge dessell1 einen positive:nEfekt der Auslese.Der KnoHenertrag ist positiv koreliert mit der Knollenzahl negativ mit demStărkegehalt, der nul' statistisch gesichert ist, oder zwischen der Knollenzahl unddern Stărkcgehalt gibt es gal' kcine Korclation (Tabelle 7). Die Auslese fUr dic dreiMerkmale lffinn in a11en untersuchten Ortschaften durchgefUhrt werden, mit derBedingung, dass die Se1ektionsgrenze unterschi~d1ich festgelegt werden: etwashoher fur den Knollenertrag in Stefăneşti unter Bewăsserungsbedingl.lngen,undniedriger fiiI' den Stărkeinhalt. Fur Braşov und Suceava konnen die gleichen Selektionsgrenzenfur die Knollenzahl und Stărkegehalt festgelegt werden.
VARIABILITATEA IN POPULAŢII HIBRIDE 191I3.\1EI-ILIHBOCTh HEI-tOTOPbIX I1PH3BAHOB B rHBPHJI.HbIXBEI'ETATHBHblX nOI1YJIHIJ.HHX H~APTOcDE,nH, 11 ax IlPUr0JI.HOCTbJ~JIH OTBOPA B PABJrIfLIHbIX IIOQBEHHO-I-tJIVIMATHQECRHX~~CJIOBHHXP E 3 10 NI E13 nO t lBi3HHO-ICIIIMaTIPI8CKHX yC.nOBTIHX 1969-1970 r.,n Dpamonc, CylIaBo, HJIYif,leHanOHc II IlITc(1)::lHeln'l'h-Ap;~a,8In, IWyTfa'JlOch 9 rII6p][;~HhIX BerCntTIIBHl,IX IIony.JUlIHtn},aCaIOIlJ,eLicH pa3Ho06paBIIH eiJeHO'l'HITlflleCH:OrO rrpOHB.1ieHHH ypomaH I,JIS"UHeN, IW;Iil t tecTBa rmyuHetI II cOÂepiRaHHH I{paXl'vw.na, a Tal-,'(J,e II npnrO;J;IIOC'l'H 3'l'llX npUSHaHOB AJIR 0'1'60pa. Y CTanOBJldHO 60.n:hIlIoe pa3HooopaalI8 MorYll~ee UbITb npnmlcuHo HaH ;a,etlcTBIHoreHe'rIItIeCIUIX ttHl.HTOpOB Ta!: II epaHTopaM CPCÂbI, B saBIICHMOCTH OT I!IsytlaeMoroIIpH3HaH~L3ml.'IeHHJI rW8tPtlmu;n8HTOB Iwppe.~IJ1I~HII ITO npIL.JHarC'[HI Me;f\;:J;y rop;aMII (Ta5JIHUu 6)nOI,a3bIBaIOT GOJIbLllyIO 1I0BTopHeMocTh epeHoTulHILfecHoro npOHBJIeHIHI I1IHI3HUIWD 1:1,CJIC;~OBaTem,Ho, IIO:lOrKlITe:lbHhltî nq1
Page 1: ANALEINSTITUTUL DE CERCETĂRIPENTRU
Page 4 and 5: Adresa: str. Fundăturii nr. 2, 220
Page 6 and 7: 4CONTENTSPraf. dr. dac. GII. VALUŢ
Page 8 and 9: 6COAEP)I(AHHETIp. ;J;p. ;J;U. r. BA
Page 10 and 11: 8mentările legate de plantarea de
Page 12 and 13: 10 r. FonOR ŞI COLAB.au constatat
Page 14 and 15: ProducţiaVariantemedie de tubercul
Page 16 and 17: Tabelul 5 1:;1Procentul mediu de am
Page 18 and 19: 16 r. FODOR ŞI COLAB.Tabelul 7Coef
Page 23 and 24: 21Lucr. şt., LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL. 1
Page 25 and 26: MUTAGENEZA -CREARE DE SOIURIS-au fo
Page 27 and 28: MUTAGENEZA - CREARE DE SOIURI 25Pro
Page 29 and 30: MUTAGENEZÂ - CREARE DE SOIU,RI 27p
Page 31 and 32: Tabelul 5Producţia.de tuberculi (g
Page 33 and 34: Comparaţie C( % (test X 2 )Tabelul
Page 35 and 36: MUTAGENEZA - CREARE nE SOIURI 33---
Page 37 and 38: MUTAGENEZÂ - CREARE DE SOIURt 35MC
Page 39 and 40: 37LucI'. şt., LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL,
Page 41 and 42: REZISTENŢA LA MANĂ39Tabelul 2Comp
Page 43 and 44: REZISTENŢA LA MANĂ 41sibile. Soiu
Page 45: REZISTENŢA LA MANĂ43BIBLIOGRAFIEC
Page 48 and 49: 46 S. MUREŞAN ŞI I. NEGUŢIiar î
Page 50 and 51: 48S. MUREŞAN ŞI 1. NEGUŢIDinamic
Page 52 and 53: 50 S. MUREŞAN ŞI I. NEGUŢIDinami
Page 54 and 55: 52 S·. MUREŞAN ŞI I. NEGUŢITabe
Page 57 and 58: 55Lucr. şt. LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL, 19
Page 59 and 60: EXPERIENŢE CU SOIURI DE CARTOFS7Ca
Page 61 and 62: EXPERIENTE cu SaTURI DE CARfI'OF59T
Page 63 and 64: mXPERIENŢE cu SOIURI DE CARTOF 611
Page 65: EXPERIENŢE CU SOIURI DE CARTOF 63l
Page 68 and 69: 66 S. MAN ŞI C. DRAICAvectoare sî
Page 70 and 71:
-'5. lVIAN ŞI C. DRAICATabelul 1V6
Page 72 and 73:
70 S. MAN ŞI C. DRAICAzelor trutan
Page 74 and 75:
72 S. MAN ŞI C. DRAICATabelul 5Inf
Page 76 and 77:
74 S. MAN ŞI C. DRAICAVERSUCHE HIN
Page 79 and 80:
77Lucr. şt. LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL, 19
Page 81 and 82:
TEHNOLOGIA DE CULTIVARE A CARTOFULU
Page 83 and 84:
TEHNOLOGIA DE CULT!VARE A CARTOFULU
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89:
Page 92 and 93:
90 1. SIMIONESCU ŞI COLAB.In vas1
Page 94 and 95:
92 I. _SIMIONESCU ŞI COLAB.1 VID l
Page 96 and 97:
I. SIM!ONESCU ŞI COLAH.după care
Page 98 and 99:
. SIMIONESCU ŞI COLAB.plet atenuat
Page 100 and 101:
98 r. SIMIONESCU ŞI COLAB.2DO139,4
Page 103 and 104:
101Lucr. şt. LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL, I
Page 105 and 106:
REGIM DE IRIGARE LA CARTOF 103Pentr
Page 107 and 108:
ConsumSinteza rezultatelor obţinut
Page 109 and 110:
Zona naturalăZona pădurilor de fa
Page 111 and 112:
REGIM DE IRIGARE LA CARTOF109Rezult
Page 113 and 114:
REGIM DE IRIGARE LA CARTOF 111Numă
Page 115 and 116:
REGIM DE IRIGARE LA CARTOF 113Silvo
Page 117 and 118:
115Lucr. şt. LC.C.S. - CARTOFUL, 1
Page 119 and 120:
FERTILIZAREA ŞI REACŢIA LA MANĂ
Page 121 and 122:
FEHTILIZAREA ŞI REACŢIA LA MANĂ1
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
FERTILIZAREA ŞI REACŢIA LA MANĂ1
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
F'ERTILIZAREA ŞI REACŢIA LA MANĂ
Page 131 and 132:
FERTILI2AHEA ŞI REACŢIA LA MANĂD
Page 133 and 134:
131LucI'. şt. LC.C.S. - CAHTOFUL,
Page 135 and 136:
COMBATEREA MANEI CU NOI FUNGICIDE.
Page 137 and 138:
COMBATEREA MANEI CU NOI FUNGICIDE 5
Page 139 and 140:
~Nr.}'itetoxidtatea ]principalelor
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
COMBATEREA MANEI CU NOI FUNGIcmEDup
Page 145:
Page 148 and 149:
146 EM. ROMAŞCU ŞI N. STAICUiar d
Page 150 and 151:
148 EM. ROMAŞCU ŞI N. STAICUpătr
Page 153 and 154:
151--------------------------------
Page 155 and 156:
ORGANIZAHEA PHODUCŢIEI PENTRU CONS
Page 157 and 158:
ORGANIZAREA PRODUCŢIEI PENTRU CONS
Page 159 and 160:
ORGANIZAREA PRODUCŢIEI PENTRU CONS
Page 161 and 162:
ORGANIZAREA PRC)DUCTIEI PENTRU CONS
Page 163:
OHGANIZAREA PRODUCŢIEI PENTRU CONS
Page 166 and 167:
w164 I. CEAUŞESCU ŞI COLAE.tofii
Page 168 and 169:
166 I. CEAUŞESCUFig. 2 - Organizar
Page 170 and 171:
168 1. CEAUŞESCU SI ('OLAR[ ZONĂ
Page 172 and 173:
170r. "'''''''''.
Page 174 and 175:
172 I. CEAUŞESCU ŞI COLAB.Voivode
Page 176 and 177:
. CEAUŞESCU'ŞI" COLAB.prafeţelor
Page 179 and 180:
12 = ('!. 12R1, Lucr. şt. Le.C.S.
Page 181 and 182:
DETERMINAREA SUPRAFEŢEI FOLIARE 11
Page 183 and 184:
DETERMINAR'EA SUPRAFEŢEI FOLIARETa
Page 185 and 186:
DETERMINAR!EA SUPRAFEŢEI FOLIARE 1
Page 187:
DETERMINAREA SUPRAFEŢEI FOLIAREBEI
Page 190 and 191:
188BACTERIOZE, MICOZE, DAUNATORI(BA
Page 192 and 193:
(The influence of irrigation upon t
Page 194 and 195:
192ANUL 1912FIZIOLOGIE, BIOCIHMIE (
Page 196 and 197:
p'Qţata- ~n. Q, te;tWI:· Y~M.s- r
Page 198 and 199:
- REICHBUCH, L., BREDT, H., COPONY,
Page 200 and 201:
198TEHNOLOGIA CULTIVARII, MECANIZAR
Page 202 and 203:
200BACTERIOZE, MICOZE, DAUNATORI (B
Page 204 and 205:
VIROZE .(VIRUS DISEASES)COJOCARU, N
Page 206:
204tot mai stringentă. Trecerea la
show all

anale 8.pdf - Institutul National de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?