Formidling af digitaliseret kulturarv af Henrik Dybdahl - Forskning
Formidling af digitaliseret kulturarv af Henrik Dybdahl - Forskning
Formidling af digitaliseret kulturarv af Henrik Dybdahl - Forskning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FORMIDLING AF DIGITALISERET KULTURARV<br />
Speciale 2011 Det Informationsvidenskabelige Akademi<br />
<strong>Henrik</strong> <strong>Dybdahl</strong> hd@thedybdahl.com tel 2617 1031<br />
Vejledt <strong>af</strong> professor Beth Juncker<br />
FORMIDLING AF DIGITALISERET KULTURARV<br />
<strong>Henrik</strong> <strong>Dybdahl</strong> startede på Danmarks Biblioteksskole i 2005<br />
og har i herværende speciale skrevet 50 normalsider.<br />
Forsideillustration og kapitelforsider <strong>af</strong> THED.C et kulturaktivisme-projekt<br />
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thedc<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
This masters thesis titled Communicating digitalized cultural heritage is<br />
framed by the research question How do institutions under the Ministry of<br />
Culture relate to communicating digitalized cultural heritage? The thesis<br />
starts by explaining the Danish concept of heritage and moves futher on<br />
explaining and exemplifieng the concept of prosuming. Then it analyzes the<br />
recommendations stated in five reports from the Ministry and the Digitization<br />
Committee. Then the thesis work with three case studies: The Royal Library,<br />
National Archives and the Danish Folklore Archives. Each case is analyzed<br />
through the performance contract with the Ministry, interviews and analysis<br />
of website. Finally it is beeing tested how open minded and the institutions<br />
are to external partners coming with ideas on how to develop new<br />
communications projects. Findings: The institutions seems apparently open<br />
to discuss project ideas with external actors. In addition, the thesis finds that<br />
there is no direct correlation between the reports recommendations to open<br />
up for new users and making cultural heritage wide digitally accessible, and<br />
the institutions way of acting. There also is a big difference in how the<br />
institutions work with the dissemination of cultural heritage and their position<br />
on this.<br />
2