11.07.2015 Aufrufe

הגיאולוגיה של הכרמל מחזורים וולקנו - Geological Survey of Israel - המכון ...

הגיאולוגיה של הכרמל מחזורים וולקנו - Geological Survey of Israel - המכון ...

הגיאולוגיה של הכרמל מחזורים וולקנו - Geological Survey of Israel - המכון ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Formation consists <strong>of</strong> bedded dolomites, and in southern Carmel it displays a facies changeinto the undivided Bina Formation. The described stratigraphic relationship between the tw<strong>of</strong>ormations is different from the common one in northern <strong>Israel</strong> (where the Bina Formationoverlies the Sakhnin Formation). It is consistent, however, with the observations concerningthe occurrences <strong>of</strong> limestone facies in the Sakhnin Formation, and dolomitic facies in the BinaFormation. The fourth cycle, like the two preceding ones, started with rapid subsidencethroughout most <strong>of</strong> the Carmel. It was different, however, by the establishment <strong>of</strong> reef (andbioclastic products) environments, rather than the planktonic environments that characterizedthe beginnings <strong>of</strong> the previous cycles.The great variety <strong>of</strong> features that is displayed in the different cycles can be related to anumber <strong>of</strong> controlling factors and their mutual interactions.1. Bathymetry. The carbonate platform in the Carmel area was rather flat and uniform duringdeposition <strong>of</strong> the first cycle (Albian). During the Cenomanian-Turonian two subenvironmentswere recognized, the one restricted and relatively shallow, the other openand deeper (65-80 m). Local slopes were established between the two sub-environments,but otherwise there is no evidence <strong>of</strong> a directional and uniform slope. The edge <strong>of</strong> theplatform, whether rimmed or non-rimmed, was well defined, and beyond it started thesteep slope towards the Tethys Ocean.2. Rudist reefs. Rudist reefs occurred as either barrier or isolated forms. The barrier reefswere located along the edge <strong>of</strong> the platform exclusively, even though at certain times somestretches <strong>of</strong> the platform’s edge were not colonized by reefs. One effect <strong>of</strong> the barrier reefswas the restriction <strong>of</strong> water exchange between the open sea and the platform, whichresulted in elevated salinity. The abundant dolomites in association with the barrier reefsare ascribed to these effects. The non-rimmed parts <strong>of</strong> the platform contain mostly chalksand limestones, which reflect normal salinity and improved water circulation. Isolatedreefs are recognized both on the platform and the platform’s edge. They had a key roleduring accumulation <strong>of</strong> the Muhraqa Member (Bina Formation), in affecting bathymetry,sediment type, and water circulation in their proximity.3. Volcanic activity. The majority <strong>of</strong> volcanic eruptions in Mount Carmel were explosive,with only a few effusive ones. It took place in four separate phases from the Latest Albian(99 Myr) to the Late Cenomanian (95.4 Myr), and a single Senonian event (82 Myr). Three<strong>of</strong> these phases (V 1 , V 2 , V 4 ) were active at the beginnings <strong>of</strong> cycles 2, 3, and 4respectively, and one (V 3 ) in the middle <strong>of</strong> the Zikhron Formation (third cycle). Thepyroclastic volcanoes formed relatively small cones, which protruded out <strong>of</strong> the sea duringIII

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!