30.01.2013 Aufrufe

Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 06/08 - DLR Online: Deutsche ...

Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 06/08 - DLR Online: Deutsche ...

Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 06/08 - DLR Online: Deutsche ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

Tab. 5 Content changes of esters in fruit spirits during maturation<br />

Concentration of ethyl acetate [g/l alcohol 100 % (v/v)]<br />

Sample [%, v/v] 45 55 65 55<br />

Maturation time<br />

[weeks]<br />

20 °C 40 °C<br />

0 1.34±0.10 (P)<br />

0.11±0.10 (A)<br />

3 0.69±0.05 (P)<br />

0.84±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

6 0.60±0.05 (P)<br />

0.84±0.07 (A)<br />

9 0.60±0.05 (P)<br />

0.79±0.07 (A)<br />

P: plum sprit; A: aronia spirit<br />

Tab. 6 Content changes of cyanic acid in fruit spirits during maturation<br />

Concentration of cyanic acid [g/l alcohol 100 % (v/v)]<br />

Sample [%, v/v] 45 55 65 55<br />

Maturation time<br />

[weeks]<br />

20 °C 40 °C<br />

0 0.59±0.05 (P)<br />

1.25±0.09 (A)<br />

3 0.55±0.05 (P)<br />

1.16±0.07 (A)<br />

6 0.43±0.04 (P)<br />

1.17±0.07 (A)<br />

9 0.43±0.04 (P)<br />

1.05±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

P: plum sprit; A: aronia spirit<br />

0.59±0.05 (P)<br />

1.25±0.09 (A)<br />

0.55±0.05 (P)<br />

1.11±0.07 (A)<br />

0.43±0.04 (P)<br />

1.02±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.43±0.04 (P)<br />

1.05±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.59±0.05 (P)<br />

1.25±0.09 (A)<br />

0.50±0.05 (P)<br />

1.09±0.<strong>08</strong> (A)<br />

0.40±0.04 (P)<br />

1.04±0.07 (A)<br />

0.33±0.03 (P)<br />

0.95±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

Tab. 7 Content changes of ethyl carbamate in fruit spirits during maturation<br />

tion after 9 weeks of maturation was also found. The values<br />

of Pearson`s index (r), ranging from 0.96<strong>08</strong> in plum spirits<br />

to 0.9978 in aronia spirits, proved the satisfactory accuracy<br />

of this description. Under extreme maturation conditions<br />

(40 °C), the ethyl carbamate content increase turned out to<br />

be ca. 62 % on average. Our results are in accordance with<br />

the study of Mildau et al. 2) and Tegmo-Larsson et al. 18) .<br />

0.59±0.05 (P)<br />

1.25±0.09 (A)<br />

0.05±0.005 (P)<br />

0.46±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.03±0.004 (P)<br />

0.30±0.04 (A)<br />

0.03±0.004 (P)<br />

0.05±0.0<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

Concentration of ethyl carbamate [g/l alcohol 100 % (v/v)]<br />

Sample [%, v/v] 45 55 65 55<br />

Maturation time<br />

[weeks]<br />

20 °C 40 °C<br />

0 0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.02 (A)<br />

3 0.14±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.03 (A)<br />

6 0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.03 (A)<br />

9 0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.26±0.03 (A)<br />

P: plum sprit; A: aronia spirit<br />

1.34±0.10 (P)<br />

0.11±0.10 (A)<br />

0.62±0.04 (P)<br />

0.89±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.59±0.04 (P)<br />

0.90±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.63±0.04 (P)<br />

0.82±0.07 (A)<br />

0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.02 (A)<br />

0.15±0.01 (P)<br />

0.27±0.03 (A)<br />

0.16±0.02 (P)<br />

0.30±0.03 (A)<br />

0.16±0.02 (P)<br />

0.31±0.03 (A)<br />

1.34±0.10 (P)<br />

0.11±0.10 (A)<br />

0.77±0.04 (P)<br />

0.84±0.07 (A)<br />

0.63±0.04 (P)<br />

0.86±0.<strong>06</strong> (A)<br />

0.67±0.04 (P)<br />

0.81±0.07 (A)<br />

0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.02 (A)<br />

0.16±0.01 (P)<br />

0.27±0.03 (A)<br />

0.17±0.02 (P)<br />

0.32±0.03 (A)<br />

0.17±0.02 (P)<br />

0.35±0.03 (A)<br />

1.34±0.10 (P)<br />

0.11±0.10 (A)<br />

0.58±0.04 (P)<br />

0.85±0.07 (A)<br />

0.49±0.04 (P)<br />

0.72±0.05 (A)<br />

0.45±0.04 (P)<br />

0.61±0.05 (A)<br />

0.13±0.01 (P)<br />

0.25±0.02 (A)<br />

0.18±0.01 (P)<br />

0.32±0.03 (A)<br />

0.17±0.02 (P)<br />

0.32±0.03 (A)<br />

0.22±0.02 (P)<br />

0.39±0.03 (A)<br />

The concentrations of ethyl carbamate in<br />

fruit spirits after 9 weeks of maturation<br />

in the presence of oak shavings ranged<br />

from 0.13 mg to 0.22 mg/l alcohol 100 %<br />

(v/v) in plum spirits and from 0.26 mg to<br />

0.39 mg/l alcohol 100 % (v/v) in aronia<br />

spirits, thus meeting the requirements of<br />

German and Canadian standards established<br />

for distillates made of stone fruits<br />

(0.4 mg/l) 5) .<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The study was financed by the State<br />

Committee for Scientific Research (KBN)<br />

under a research Project No. 2P<strong>06</strong>T 007<br />

26.<br />

References<br />

1) Teševic V, Nikicevic N, Jovanovic A, Djokovic D,<br />

Vujisic L, Vuckovic I, Bonic M: Food Technol Biotechnol<br />

43, 367–372 (2005).<br />

2) Mildau G, Preuss A, Frank W, Heering W: Deut<br />

Lebensm-Rundsch 3, 69–74 (1987).<br />

3) Ough CS: J Agr Food Chem 24, 323–328 (1976).<br />

4) Stoewsand GS, Anderson Jl, Munson l: Food<br />

Chem Toxicol 29, 291–295 (1991).<br />

5) Christoph N, Schmitt A, Hildenbrand K: Alk Ind<br />

16, 369–404 (1987).<br />

6) Reazin G: Amer J Enol Vitic 32, 286–289 (1981).<br />

7) Polish Standard PN-90/A-75101: Fruit and vegetable<br />

products. Preparation of samples and methods<br />

of physicochemical analyses (1990).<br />

8) Polish Standard PN-A-79528: Spirit (ethyl alcohol).<br />

Methods of tests (2000).<br />

9) Polish Standard PN-A-79528-2: Spirit (ethyl alcohol).<br />

Methods of tests. Part 2: Organoleptic<br />

evaluation of spirit and spirit drinks (2002).<br />

10) Polish Standard PN-A-79529-13: Spirit drinks<br />

and bottled spirit. Methods of tests. Determination<br />

of cyanic acid (2005).<br />

11) Conacher HBS, Page BD, Lau BP, Lawrence JF,<br />

Bailey R, Calway P, Hanchay JP, Mori B: J Assoc<br />

Off Anal Chem 4, 749–751 (1987).<br />

12) Mangas J, Rodriguez R, Moreno J, Blanco D:<br />

Lebensm-Wiss Technol 29, 357–364 (1996).<br />

13) Nielepkowicz-Charczuk A, Gamrot M: Przem Ferm<br />

Owoc-Warz . 9, 17–18 (1993).<br />

14) Sefton MA: Australian Grapegrower & Winemaker<br />

355, 17–25 (1993).<br />

15) Nielepkowicz-Charczuk A, Balcerek M, Koper A:<br />

Przem Ferm Owoc-Warz 8, 34–37 (1998).<br />

16) Mangas J, Rodriguez R, Moreno J, Blanco D: J Agr Food Chem 44, 268–<br />

273 (1996).<br />

17) Schehl B, Lachenmeier D, Seen T, Heinisch J: J Agr Food Chem 53,<br />

8230–8238 (2005).<br />

18) Tegmo-Larsson I, Spitter T: J Food Sci 55, 1166–1169 (1990).<br />

292 ı Originalarbeiten <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Lebensmittel</strong>-<strong>Rundschau</strong> ı 104. Jahrgang, Heft 6, 20<strong>08</strong>

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!