27.02.2013 Views

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>DAI</strong> worked in the<br />

Caribbean and<br />

elsewhere to help<br />

economies diversify<br />

from rural agriculture<br />

into the production <strong>of</strong><br />

exportable goods.<br />

36<br />

vention in Grenada in 1983. Originally, HIAMP<br />

was an unusually experimental and innovative<br />

project that aimed to bring U.S. agribusiness<br />

expertise and deal-making techniques to the<br />

very small island economies <strong>of</strong> Barbados, Grenada,<br />

and their West Indian neighbors.<br />

Mickelwait had participated in the design <strong>of</strong><br />

HIAMP, along with Don Humpal, who recalls<br />

“it was very complex, and Don [Mickelwait]<br />

probably understood it better than many <strong>of</strong> our<br />

clients and local counterparts.” This distinction<br />

cut both ways: it helped <strong>DAI</strong> prepare a winning<br />

proposal, but it also meant that HIAMP was perceived<br />

as a risky venture by many <strong>of</strong> its stakeholders.<br />

The project goal was to empower local<br />

entrepreneurs to move the economy beyond<br />

tourism, bananas, and sugar cane to high-value<br />

export products. Although <strong>DAI</strong>’s team identified<br />

many promising opportunities—encompassing<br />

28 subprojects across seven island states—<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the prospective local investors proved<br />

risk-averse, and personnel and policy changes<br />

in USAID’s regional agriculture <strong>of</strong>fice resulted<br />

in restrictive directives that frustrated the field<br />

team, as well as Humpal and Mickelwait. Four<br />

<strong>years</strong> after it started, the leaders <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

<strong>DAI</strong> team were gone, and HIAMP lost its<br />

entrepreneurial edge, with most <strong>of</strong> its activities<br />

scaled back to a more traditional technical assistance<br />

model.<br />

In other countries, however, <strong>DAI</strong> demonstrated<br />

greater persuasiveness and staying power<br />

when it brought new ideas to the client’s table.<br />

In Indonesia, Bill Fuller—after many <strong>years</strong> in<br />

Asia with the Ford Foundation—had arrived in<br />

1982 as a noncareer USAID mission director.<br />

He encouraged innovation by his own staff and<br />

the organizations that supported the country<br />

program. Among the new initiatives was the<br />

Central Java Enterprise Development Project<br />

(CJEDP), whose design would involve in-depth<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> leading subsectors in the provincial<br />

economy. This challenging task appealed to<br />

Mickelwait, who threw his energies into writing a<br />

successful proposal for the two-year project design<br />

contract. Gary Kilmer was named CJEDP’s<br />

Chief <strong>of</strong> Party, and he found himself interacting<br />

closely with Fuller’s highly engaged team at<br />

USAID, which demanded a rigorous analytical<br />

approach to this novel project. Kilmer recalls,<br />

“They needed convincing that their ideas would<br />

really work in practice.” Among those initially on<br />

USAID’s side <strong>of</strong> this exercise was Jim Boomgard,<br />

a young academic who had been trained

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!