27.02.2013 Views

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When new projects first appeared in Afghanistan,<br />

early in 2002, <strong>DAI</strong> fielded a team to restore<br />

irrigation systems in Helmand Province, another<br />

to establish a central micr<strong>of</strong>inance facility that<br />

would support local lenders, and a third to work<br />

with the rural development ministry to implement<br />

the countrywide National Solidarity Program<br />

(NSP). Jointly implemented by Germany’s<br />

GTZ International and <strong>DAI</strong>, the NSP was widely<br />

recognized as an effective model for matching<br />

donor resources (in this case, a World Bank<br />

loan) with community priorities. The first three<br />

<strong>years</strong> <strong>of</strong> work in Afghanistan were productive<br />

and almost entirely free <strong>of</strong> security incidents.<br />

By 2005, however, the revival <strong>of</strong> the Taliban<br />

insurgency and the weakness <strong>of</strong> the Afghan<br />

government darkened the picture, forcing <strong>DAI</strong>,<br />

like other project implementers, to take many<br />

more precautions to protect <strong>of</strong>fices, residences,<br />

and staff travel within the country.<br />

The onset <strong>of</strong> the war in Iraq posed interesting<br />

choices for the firm. In the run-up to the March<br />

2003 invasion, <strong>DAI</strong> found itself one <strong>of</strong> three<br />

firms prequalified to bid on a contract to deploy<br />

several hundred expatriate local government<br />

experts, which would bring in new revenue <strong>of</strong><br />

$300 million, and possibly much more. After<br />

extensive internal discussion—which occurred<br />

in an open-book atmosphere so that <strong>DAI</strong><br />

employees could appreciate the pros and cons<br />

<strong>of</strong> the decision—Michael Morfit’s governance<br />

team concluded that the downside risks (doubts<br />

about the scope <strong>of</strong> work, especially the huge<br />

emphasis on high-cost expats, and serious concerns<br />

about security in the midst and aftermath<br />

<strong>of</strong> war) outweighed any benefits to <strong>DAI</strong>. Barclay<br />

and the other members <strong>of</strong> the executive team<br />

concurred with the no-bid decision. “Even at<br />

our size, that contract was big enough to turn<br />

the company upside down if things didn’t go<br />

according to plan,” Barclay recalled, “and we<br />

didn’t much like the plan.”<br />

Simultaneously, however, <strong>DAI</strong> produced a concept<br />

paper, and later a full proposal, to manage<br />

an OTI grants program modeled on SWIFT that<br />

would rely much more on Iraqi personnel and<br />

local organizations, and use in-kind grants to<br />

ensure that the resources produced tangible results.<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> Getu Reta to lead this team<br />

gave everyone confidence: he had worked with<br />

Kurdish groups in northern Iraq after the first<br />

Gulf War and had done an excellent job as Chief<br />

<strong>of</strong> Party on <strong>DAI</strong>’s Timor-Leste program with<br />

OTI. Among the team’s first initiatives was to<br />

set up a communications center in Umm Qasr,<br />

<strong>DAI</strong> was in Baghdad<br />

soon after U.S. troops<br />

captured the city in<br />

2003. The need for<br />

fast implementation<br />

made <strong>DAI</strong> one <strong>of</strong><br />

USAID’s principal<br />

implementing<br />

partners.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!