27.02.2013 Views

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

40 years of DAI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In 2005, <strong>DAI</strong> began working to create a more cohesive brand<br />

identity. The new brand, unveiled at the May 2006 staff<br />

conference, was striking in its simplicity and its departure from<br />

convention. At its heart was a new logo, soon dubbed the “<strong>DAI</strong><br />

Flag,” which consisted <strong>of</strong> three bars <strong>of</strong> color, with the brown<br />

representing strong foundations, the green signifying results,<br />

and the blue evoking aspirations—both those <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

and those “that our clients and beneficiaries hold for their own<br />

future.” The award-winning new scheme was immediately<br />

successful, as employees quickly embraced the step toward<br />

forging a one-company mentality.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the things <strong>DAI</strong> celebrates most visibly is employee<br />

tenure, with public acknowledgment for all employees passing<br />

key milestones. Pictured from left to right are Carol Kulski, Tami<br />

Fries, and Tony Johnson, who have celebrated their 25-, 20-, and<br />

25-year anniversaries with the company, respectively.<br />

88<br />

commissioned Houlihan Lokey, an investment banking firm<br />

with a strong ESOP practice, to evaluate the options for ownership<br />

and compare the ESOP to other investment vehicles.<br />

Over the course <strong>of</strong> several meetings in 2005, the Board<br />

debated the Houlihan Lokey report, which recommended a<br />

recapitalization <strong>of</strong> <strong>DAI</strong> based on the use <strong>of</strong> new bank debt to<br />

buy back all shares owned by individuals. This would leave<br />

the ESOP as <strong>DAI</strong>’s sole owner, after which <strong>DAI</strong> would convert<br />

to a Subchapter S corporation. Going forward would require<br />

taking on significant long-term debt ($15 million to be repaid<br />

over five <strong>years</strong>) as well as the willingness <strong>of</strong> all 70 individuals<br />

to sell their shares. The Board took pains to ensure that <strong>DAI</strong><br />

was prepared on both counts. Although at least one external<br />

director expressed concern that management seemed to be<br />

putting employee ownership ahead <strong>of</strong> other strategic considerations,<br />

Jim Boomgard insisted that “independence is a<br />

critical part <strong>of</strong> our DNA,” and the transaction was approved. It<br />

closed in December, and to the surprise <strong>of</strong> the attorney who<br />

handled the paperwork, all 70 individual shareholders willingly<br />

tendered their stock, receiving an excellent return on the<br />

funds they had invested in prior <strong>years</strong>.<br />

To access the necessary funds, <strong>DAI</strong> negotiated a new credit<br />

agreement, this time with a syndicate <strong>of</strong> five banks, combining<br />

the $15 million term loan with a $60 million revolving<br />

credit line that could be used to finance accounts receivable<br />

as the company continued to grow. The result was a<br />

much closer alignment between its capital structure and its<br />

employees’ interest in enhancing their own financial wellbeing<br />

through steady, long-term appreciation in the value <strong>of</strong><br />

the firm. As Boomgard put it, “We make a lot <strong>of</strong> decisions<br />

over the course <strong>of</strong> any year that wouldn’t satisfy an outside<br />

financial investor, or a public company focused on meeting its<br />

quarterly earnings forecasts, but are the right things to do for<br />

our employee owners.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!