3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot
3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot
3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Endocannabinoids and regulation of fertility 69<br />
It can be proposed that down-regulation of FAAH during early pregnancy<br />
might allow higher local levels of AEA, which indeed have been shown to<br />
increase with pregnancy in the mouse uterus [5]. In turn, AEA might play a<br />
role in the endometrial changes associated with pregnancy, for instance<br />
through the inhibition of gap junctions and intercellular calcium signalling<br />
[21, 22]. On the other hand, nanomolar concentrations of AEA inhibit embryo<br />
development and blastocysts hatching in vitro [5, 20, 23]. This suggests that<br />
the local concentration of AEA around the implanting embryos must be low,<br />
implying that the blastocysts have the biochemical tools to dispose AEA and<br />
to prevent its detrimental effects. Indeed, AMT and FAAH activity have been<br />
demonstrated and characterized in these cells [20]. Moreover, AEA-induced<br />
inhibition of embryo development and blastocyst hatching is prevented by a<br />
CB 1 receptor antagonist, in line with the hypothesis that this activity of AEA<br />
is mediated by CB 1 receptors [3].<br />
Collectively, these findings lead to a dual function of AEA in regulating fertility<br />
in mammals, a scenario that is schematically depicted in Figure 1. On one<br />
hand, a decreased FAAH activity in mouse uterus during early pregnancy<br />
might allow higher levels of AEA at the inter-implantation sites. Here,<br />
enhanced AEA can be instrumental in modifying endometrium by inhibiting<br />
gap junctions. On the other hand, a low level of AEA has to be granted at the<br />
implantation sites, in order to reduce the toxic effects of this lipid to the blastocysts.<br />
The reduction of AEA levels can be achieved by the active AMT and<br />
FAAH expressed by blastocysts, as well as by the uterine epithelial cells. It<br />
seems noteworthy that dual functions of AEA, depending upon its local concentration,<br />
have been already proposed to explain its anti-proliferative (high<br />
AEA) or pro-proliferative (low AEA) effects on trophoblast growth at the<br />
inter-implantation and implantation sites, respectively [18]. Consistently, AEA<br />
has been shown to regulate blastocyst function and implantation within a very<br />
narrow concentration range, by differentially modulating mitogen-activated<br />
protein kinase signalling and calcium channel activity via CB 1 receptors [24].<br />
The embryo–uterine interactions are further complicated by the recent finding<br />
that mouse blastocysts rapidly (within 30 min of culture) release a soluble<br />
compound that increases by approximately 2.5-fold the activity of FAAH<br />
present in the mouse uterus without affecting gene expression at the translational<br />
level [25]. This “FAAH activator” is not present in uterine fluid, is<br />
released by neither dead blastocysts nor mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and is<br />
produced by trophoblast and inner cell-mass cells. Moreover, its activity is<br />
fully neutralized by lipase and is further potentiated by trypsin, whereas other<br />
proteases, phospholipases A 2, C or D, DNase I or RNase A are ineffective.<br />
Interestingly, the blastocyst-derived activator does not affect PLD, CB receptors<br />
or AMT in mouse uterus, pointing to a selective action towards FAAH. As<br />
yet the FAAH activator, the first ever reported to our knowledge, has not been<br />
identified with any factor known to be released by blastocysts, like<br />
platelet-activating factor, leukotriene B 4 or prostaglandins E 2 and F 2α, and its<br />
molecular identity remains elusive [25]. However, the fact that a specific