01.03.2013 Views

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 J. Fernández-Ruiz et al.<br />

exerted preferentially through the activation of CB 1 receptors that, in this case,<br />

would be postsynaptically located (on neurons containing NMDA glutamate<br />

receptors) in contrast with those involved in the inhibition of glutamate release<br />

which would be presynaptically located (see Fig. 1). Several types of calcium<br />

channel (mainly N-, L- and P/Q-types) have been reported to be coupled to<br />

CB 1 receptors and are inhibited by the activation of these receptors [43–46].<br />

In addition, AEA has been also reported to directly interact with T-type Ca 2+<br />

channels [47]. Cannabinoid agonists also affect K + currents by opening<br />

inwardly rectifying K + channels [44, 48, 49], an effect that might be also part<br />

of the neuroprotective action of cannabinoids.<br />

This direct Ca 2+ -lowering effect of cannabinoid agonists would add to the<br />

reduction of this ion produced indirectly as a consequence of the anti-glutamatergic<br />

effects of cannabinoids, which, through reducing glutamate release or<br />

blocking NMDA receptors (see above), would result in a reduction of glutamatergic<br />

receptor-mediated Ca 2+ entry into the cells. As a consequence of this<br />

direct and/or indirect inhibition of Ca 2+ influx produced by cannabinoid agonists,<br />

they would reduce the activation of Ca 2+ -dependent cytotoxic cascades<br />

thus preventing neuronal damage [4–6]. In support of this hypothesis, several<br />

studies have demonstrated that the increase of Ca 2+ influx produced by different<br />

neurotoxic stimuli, including NMDA and other excitotoxins, was reduced<br />

by different plant-derived, synthetic or endogenous cannabinoids [13, 28, 38,<br />

50, 51], and that most of these effects were counteracted by SR-141716, thus<br />

suggesting involvement of CB 1 receptor activation [28, 38].<br />

Antioxidant properties of cannabinoids<br />

Brain injury in acute and chronic neurodegeneration triggers the accumulation<br />

of harmful products, such as reactive oxygen intermediates (see [52] for<br />

review), which, if not eliminated, damage DNA, proteins or membrane lipids,<br />

leading oxidative cell death. These oxidative species are produced, in response<br />

to excitotoxicity and/or mitochondrial dysfunction, from several sources,<br />

including arachidonic acid metabolism, mitochondrial defects, and the action<br />

of NO synthase and other enzymes (see [52, 53] for review). This process,<br />

so-called oxidative stress, appears when the normal balance between oxidative<br />

events and endogenous antioxidant mechanisms (i.e. antioxidative enzymes<br />

such as superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase, glutation and<br />

small-molecule antioxidants such as vitamins A, C and E and ubiquinol) is disrupted,<br />

being responsible for secondary damage in conditions of acute neurodegeneration<br />

[54]. Certain classic cannabinoids, such as CBD, ∆ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol<br />

(∆ 9 -THC), cannabinol, nabilone, levonantradol, dexanabinol<br />

and others, that contain phenolic groups in their chemical structure, are able to<br />

reduce oxidative stress [55]. These cannabinoids are potent antioxidant compounds<br />

against reactive oxygen species formed during the ischemic metabolism<br />

or in several chronic brain injuries where oxidative stress represents a crit-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!