01.03.2013 Views

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

3. Umbruch 4.4..2005 - Online Pot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pot</strong>ential use of cannabimimetics in the treatment of cancer 167<br />

system might provide a significant contribution to both palliative and curative<br />

cancer therapies.<br />

Cannabinoid receptor stimulation causes inhibition of cancer growth<br />

through multiple intracellular mechanisms and pathways<br />

Based on Cannabis perturbation of the immune response, in vivo studies carried<br />

out in animals in the late 1990s investigated the possibility that marijuana smoking<br />

and long-term ∆ 9 -THC treatment may favor tumor growth. These studies,<br />

however, often produced opposing outcomes. For example, the enhancement of<br />

lung carcinoma was seen [25], and more recently it has been demonstrated that<br />

the treatment of glioma and lung carcinoma cell lines with nanomolar concentrations<br />

of ∆ 9 -THC, comparable with those detected in the serum of patients<br />

after ∆ 9 -THC administration, leads to accelerated cancer cell proliferation<br />

dependent on metalloprotease and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)<br />

activity [26]. While in this study the involvement of cannabinoid receptors was<br />

not investigated, in another recent work low concentrations of ∆ 9 -THC also<br />

stimulated the proliferation of prostate carcinoma cells in vitro, in a<br />

CB 1-/CB 2-mediated manner and androgen receptor-dependent manner [27].<br />

However, Munson and coworkers showed about 30 years ago that ∆ 9 -THC<br />

inhibits lung adenocarcinoma cell growth in vitro and after oral administration<br />

in mice [28], and a recent 2-year chronic administration study with high ∆ 9 -THC<br />

doses revealed a reduction of the spontaneous onset of hormone-dependent<br />

tumors in particular [29]. Experiments carried out in vitro seem to go more often<br />

in the direction of an anti-proliferative property of CB 1 and CB 2 receptor agonists<br />

(Fig. 1). For example, it was found that 4–5-day treatment of human breast<br />

cancer cell (HBCC) lines with sub-micromolar concentrations of endocannabinoids<br />

results in complete blockade of their proliferation [30]. CB 1 activation<br />

blocks the cell cycle at the G 0/G 1–S transition via the inhibition of adenylate<br />

cyclase and the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway. Protein kinase A phosphorylates<br />

and inhibits Raf1, and therefore anandamide, by preventing the inhibition<br />

of Raf1, induces the sustained activation of the Raf1/mitogen-activated protein<br />

kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling cascade<br />

[31]. These signaling events result in the inhibition of the expression of the<br />

long form of the receptor for endogenous prolactin [30], a hormone that HBCCs<br />

in culture use as an autocrine growth factor. In fact, agents activating the CB 1<br />

receptor via the same mechanism also counteract the proliferation of human<br />

prostate cancer cells when induced by exogenous prolactin [32]. Indeed, both<br />

human breast and prostate cancer cells express high levels of CB 1 receptors that<br />

had never been detected previously in the corresponding healthy tissues. HBCCs<br />

also respond to nerve growth factor (NGF) by proliferating more rapidly, and<br />

2-day treatment of HBCCs with CB 1 receptor agonists suppresses the levels of<br />

trk proteins, one of the two known types of NGF receptor, thus resulting in the<br />

inhibition of NGF-induced proliferation [32].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!