02.03.2013 Views

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plan Approval History for Mining in the North and South Barriers<br />

<strong>Crandall</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> mine management first approached MSHA District 9 personnel in April 2006<br />

about the possibility <strong>of</strong> mining the barriers surrounding Main West. This initial contact did<br />

not consist <strong>of</strong> a formal written proposal, but r<strong>at</strong>her was part <strong>of</strong> a discussion with Allyn Davis,<br />

District 9 Manager, and Billy Owens, District 9 Ro<strong>of</strong> Control Branch Supervisor, during a<br />

meeting concerning issues with another mine owned by Andalex Resources, the parent<br />

company <strong>of</strong> Genwal Resources, Inc. At th<strong>at</strong> time, Owens informed mine management th<strong>at</strong> a<br />

proposal with supporting d<strong>at</strong>a would be necessary in order to evalu<strong>at</strong>e the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

mining in the barriers. In a September 2006 meeting with MSHA, mine management<br />

submitted the requested supporting d<strong>at</strong>a in the form <strong>of</strong> two reports from Agapito Associ<strong>at</strong>es,<br />

Incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed (AAI), a consulting firm hired by the oper<strong>at</strong>or. A formal request for a ro<strong>of</strong><br />

control plan amendment was still not submitted to the District <strong>at</strong> this time. Following this<br />

meeting, Owens informed the mine oper<strong>at</strong>or th<strong>at</strong>, upon s<strong>at</strong>isfactory evalu<strong>at</strong>ion, plans for<br />

mining in the North and South Barriers <strong>of</strong> Main West would only be approved in stages.<br />

Development and retre<strong>at</strong> mining in each barrier would be approved separ<strong>at</strong>ely, with each<br />

approval contingent upon the successful completion <strong>of</strong> the preceding stage.<br />

Upon receiving the consultant’s reports, Owens assigned an engineer on his staff to conduct a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the submitted inform<strong>at</strong>ion. The AAI report d<strong>at</strong>ed July 20, 2006, described an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the proposed barrier mining which primarily used LAMODEL, a numerical<br />

modeling program developed by the N<strong>at</strong>ional Institute for Occup<strong>at</strong>ional Safety and Health<br />

(NIOSH). LAMODEL is a boundary element program used to determine stress and<br />

convergence levels which are then used to predict ground conditions. The AAI analysis<br />

<strong>at</strong>tempted to calibr<strong>at</strong>e the modeling effort by first using the LAMODEL program to simul<strong>at</strong>e<br />

historical mining in the 1 st North Left area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Crandall</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>. After this calibr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

effort, LAMODEL was then used to approxim<strong>at</strong>e conditions as the proposed barrier mining<br />

took place. The report concluded th<strong>at</strong>, “the proposed Main West 4-entry layout with 60-foot<br />

by 72-foot pillars should function adequ<strong>at</strong>ely for short-term mining in the barriers,” and th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

“Model results indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> planned mining in the barriers will avoid the majority <strong>of</strong> the sideabutment<br />

stress transferred from the adjacent longwall panel gobs.”<br />

The second <strong>of</strong> the two reports submitted to MSHA in September 2006 was a copy <strong>of</strong> an August<br />

9, 2006, AAI e-mail to mine management. This report included an additional analysis using<br />

the NIOSH s<strong>of</strong>tware program Analysis <strong>of</strong> Retre<strong>at</strong> Mining Pillar Stability (ARMPS). ARMPS is<br />

an empirically based method for determining pillar stability. The same 1 st North Left area <strong>of</strong><br />

the mine th<strong>at</strong> was used to calibr<strong>at</strong>e the LAMODEL program was used to calcul<strong>at</strong>e an<br />

acceptable ARMPS stability factor (SF) for the <strong>Crandall</strong> <strong>Canyon</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>. The AAI analysis<br />

concluded th<strong>at</strong> retre<strong>at</strong> mining in this area was, “generally successful with a SF <strong>of</strong> 0.37. “ AAI<br />

rounded the SF up to a minimum <strong>of</strong> 0.40 as, “a reasonable lower limit for retre<strong>at</strong> mining <strong>at</strong><br />

GENWAL.” The AAI analysis concluded th<strong>at</strong>, “the lowest SF for the proposed retre<strong>at</strong><br />

sequence in Main West barriers is 0.53 under the deepest cover…,” and th<strong>at</strong>, “implic<strong>at</strong>ions are<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!