02.03.2013 Views

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

Independent Review of MSHA's Actions at Crandall Canyon Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> the reporters who went into the mine on August 8 th could not be found in the check-in and<br />

check-out notebook provided to the IRT. It was also discovered th<strong>at</strong>, <strong>at</strong> times, MSHA<br />

personnel shown to be checked into the mine were actually back <strong>at</strong> the hotel where they were<br />

staying. These persons had finished their shift and left the mine site without anyone<br />

documenting th<strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> had exited the mine.<br />

During the rescue oper<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> took place from August 6 th to August 16 th , the company and<br />

MSHA oper<strong>at</strong>ed on different working shifts. The oper<strong>at</strong>or worked two 12-hour shifts; 6 a.m.<br />

to 6 p.m., and 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. MSHA worked three 8-hour shifts; 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., 3 p.m. to 11<br />

p.m., and 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. These overlapping shifts made it even more difficult to ensure th<strong>at</strong><br />

all persons checked in and out <strong>of</strong> the mine.<br />

Many MSHA personnel st<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> there were several occasions when there were people in the<br />

rescue area in the No. 1 entry who were observing wh<strong>at</strong> was going on, but were not a part <strong>of</strong><br />

the rescue effort. Most <strong>of</strong> these observers were company employees who wanted to see wh<strong>at</strong><br />

was going on or to <strong>of</strong>fer help. These visits were recurrent even though there were plan<br />

revisions to the § 103(k) order th<strong>at</strong> prohibited this. A plan approved under the § 103(k) order<br />

on August 8 th st<strong>at</strong>ed “All unnecessary persons will be kept outby the fresh air base loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong><br />

x-cut 119.” A plan revision on August 11 th st<strong>at</strong>ed “We have to limit the number <strong>of</strong> people in<br />

the # 1 entry inby xc-119. We are taking more m<strong>at</strong>erial out <strong>of</strong> the entry and going into the<br />

deeper cover. We have to take every precaution possible. NO person is allowed up in the face<br />

area unless design<strong>at</strong>ed by the foreman.” This st<strong>at</strong>ement did not limit the number <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

who could go inby crosscut 119. Instead, it allowed the foreman to determine who could be in<br />

the No. 1 entry.<br />

Many inspectors st<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> they were not aware when the oper<strong>at</strong>or was bringing unnecessary<br />

people into the mine until they arrived in the rescue area. The inspectors st<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> these<br />

unnecessary people were disruptive to the oper<strong>at</strong>ion in th<strong>at</strong> they had to stop the mining<br />

machine and haulage equipment from oper<strong>at</strong>ing while they were in the face area. The<br />

inspectors st<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> these were unnecessary hindrances to the oper<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> the command center log book showed th<strong>at</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> workers<br />

underground was being recorded. The log book distinguished between company and MSHA<br />

employees and was upd<strong>at</strong>ed regularly. Various entries in the log showed there to be more<br />

than 70 people underground <strong>at</strong> times. Interviews revealed th<strong>at</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these people<br />

performed work outby the recovery area. Interviews with MSHA personnel and a review <strong>of</strong><br />

documents revealed th<strong>at</strong> the § 103(k) order was not modified to allow any work outby the<br />

recovery area except for some explor<strong>at</strong>ion and seal monitoring work. MSHA persons-incharge<br />

were aware th<strong>at</strong> work was being performed in outby areas, but did not know wh<strong>at</strong><br />

specific work activities were being performed. Davis st<strong>at</strong>ed he did not think outby work was<br />

restricted by the § 103(k) order.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!