2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
W U P P R O J E C T U P D A T E S<br />
Each WUP process covers nine steps from initiation to<br />
submitting a draft plan, followed by four stages of review<br />
and monitoring. Status of processes underway is as follows:<br />
• ASH – completing steps two through four by confirming<br />
participants, setting objectives and developing preliminary<br />
performance measures.<br />
• BRIDGE RIVER – at steps five and six; 15 studies<br />
are completed and the committee is creating operating<br />
alternatives for the facility, following completion of data<br />
gathering pertaining to the impact of water flows and<br />
reservoir operations on plan objectives.<br />
• CAMPBELL RIVER – at steps four, five and six;<br />
environmental studies continue and the committee is establishing<br />
performance measures; fine-tuning of alternative operating<br />
regimes for the facilities will take place over the fall of <strong>2001</strong>.<br />
• CHEAKAMUS – at step four; the committee has<br />
confirmed issues surrounding operation of the facility and<br />
expressed them in terms of specific water use objectives,<br />
and now is working to establish performance measures prior to<br />
considering alternatives; 13 studies are completed or underway.<br />
British Columbia’s demand for electricity continues to grow.<br />
With existing and committed facilities, <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> can meet<br />
customer needs until 2006/07. Beyond 2007, electricity could<br />
be supplied from a wide range of resources such as energy<br />
conservation, wind, small and micro-hydro, pumped storage,<br />
biomass, fuel cells, wave, thermal and large hydro.<br />
• COQUITLAM/ BUNTZEN – at steps five and six;<br />
data gathering on the Coquitlam River is in progress,<br />
with 12 studies completed or underway, and the committee<br />
is beginning to create operating alternatives for evaluation.<br />
• JORDAN RIVER – at steps five and six; two studies<br />
are completed, and the committee has confirmed operating<br />
issues and developed initial operating alternatives.<br />
• MICA/ REVELSTOKE/ KEENLEYSIDE<br />
same status as Ash.<br />
–<br />
• PEACE – same status as Ash.<br />
• SHUSWAP – at steps four, five and six; five studies<br />
are underway or completed and data gathering is<br />
continuing to allow performance measures to be refined<br />
and to examine preliminary operating alternatives.<br />
• WAHLEACH – same status as Ash.<br />
S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y A C T I O N P L A N I N I T I A T I V E<br />
2 0 0 2 E L E C T R I C I T Y P L A N<br />
S O C I A L B O T T O M L I N E | 3 1<br />
Over the next year, <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> will be exploring these options and<br />
developing a plan to ensure British Columbians have adequate<br />
electricity well into the future.