2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
2001 Triple Bottom Line Report - BC Hydro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
W A R N I N G S A N D A C T I O N S<br />
In September 2000 the B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands<br />
and Parks (MELP) delivered a warning letter to <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> after<br />
approximately 10 litres of non-PCB oil spilled from a transformer<br />
that was being removed from our property by a demolition<br />
company. Some of the oil spilled onto the edge of a public<br />
road and a small quantity entered a nearby slough, resulting<br />
in a violation of the B.C. Waste Management Act and the<br />
federal Fisheries Act.<br />
Our internal investigation determined responsibility for the spill<br />
rested with the subcontractor, who removed the transformer<br />
before it was fully drained and plugged. We instituted new<br />
procedures to guard against a recurrence, including a formal<br />
sequence of steps for removing equipment for disposal and a<br />
requirement that work plans, spill prevention plans and<br />
environmental protection plans be part of all disposal tenders.<br />
In December 2000 we received a warning letter from MELP<br />
noting that, on four occasions, <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> arranged transportation<br />
of special wastes using carriers not licensed for such activities,<br />
contrary to Special Waste Regulations.<br />
We investigated and found the violations occurred because our<br />
shippers allowed carrier trucks to leave <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> sites without<br />
ensuring the carrier was licensed to transport special wastes.<br />
Corrective measures included advisories to all area managers<br />
about legal requirements for shipping dangerous goods. We also<br />
developed a checklist for all employees involved in shipping goods,<br />
and a training module for proper special-waste management.<br />
The Athabasca Chipewyan and Mikisew Cree First Nations in<br />
northeast Alberta have brought two separate actions before the<br />
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench against <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong>, the Province<br />
of British Columbia and Canada. Both First Nations are seeking<br />
compensation for alleged impacts downstream of our operations<br />
on the Peace River.<br />
The allegations deal with the construction and regulation of the<br />
WAC Bennett and Peace Canyon Dams and related impacts on<br />
their Reserves and on their way of life.<br />
At the end of fiscal 2000/<strong>2001</strong>, we were awaiting a decision<br />
from the Alberta Court of Appeal regarding the jurisdiction of<br />
an Alberta court to hear an action against the Province of B.C.<br />
and <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong>.<br />
E N V I R O N M E N T A L B O T T O M L I N E | 4 0