23.03.2013 Views

SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elationship with Jesus than does Peter. Brown argues that this textual data leads to the<br />

conclusion that the BD referred to by John’s gospel is more probably not one <strong>of</strong> the Twelve, but<br />

rather an otherwise scripturally unknown, unnamed, intimate friend <strong>of</strong> Jesus. It is this BD who<br />

stands at the origin <strong>of</strong> the tradition and community that gave to the Christian Church the<br />

Gospel that we now refer to as the Gospel <strong>of</strong> John .18<br />

This exegetical evidence has several implications not only for our understanding <strong>of</strong> Scripture,<br />

but also for our assumptions concerning our interpretation <strong>of</strong> art. Given the results <strong>of</strong> Brown’s<br />

research, it may be more appropriate to refer to the second figure in Cleveland’s “Christ and St.<br />

John the Evangelist” as the “Beloved Disciple.” And, given our earlier study <strong>of</strong> the first figure<br />

in the work, a more theologically and biblically appropriate title for the work as a whole would<br />

be “Jesus and the Beloved Disciple.” However, at this point we encounter another critical<br />

question that engages both art historians as well as scholarly biblical interpreters. This question<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> hermeneutics, interpretation theory.<br />

B. HERMENEUTICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

To be clear, my interest in “Christ and St. John the Evangelist” does not concern aesthetics. I<br />

am not concerned with the criteria by which the woodcarving would be considered beautiful or<br />

ugly. Rather, I envision the moment <strong>of</strong> encounter when an individual viewer walking through<br />

the Cleveland Museum <strong>of</strong> Art stops in front <strong>of</strong> this piece and beholds the work. After this<br />

aesthetic moment, I imagine such a viewer approaching the label-card to read its message. It is<br />

this moment that attracts my attention. What happens at this moment when the viewer reads<br />

the label-card?<br />

Broadly speaking, this moment involves the didactic dimension <strong>of</strong> artwork. This didactic aspect<br />

complements art’s aesthetic reality. This educational dimension <strong>of</strong> art is multifaceted. An<br />

aspiring woodcarver can ponder the work and learn about the techniques <strong>of</strong> the process. An<br />

inquisitive religious person might view the work as an object <strong>of</strong> piety and religious devotion.<br />

An art historian will want to learn this piece’s place in the chronological development <strong>of</strong><br />

woodcarving. There are many ways that art can educate.<br />

The educational perspective I wish to pursue is more general. A citizen walking through an art<br />

gallery encountering works <strong>of</strong> art: to what is this experience comparable? Perhaps it is like<br />

paging through a dictionary seeking the definition <strong>of</strong> a word. The label-card which states the<br />

work’s title is like the definition <strong>of</strong> a word found in a dictionary. This dictionary definition is<br />

laden with authority because <strong>of</strong> its context: there is an implied social submission to “Webster’s”<br />

definition as authoritative. This same sort <strong>of</strong> authority is present in the museum label. A typical<br />

viewer reads the label and takes its content as authoritative and factually true because <strong>of</strong> that<br />

same social submission to the museum and its agents.<br />

My question, then, involves the authority <strong>of</strong> the museum curator with respect to the content <strong>of</strong><br />

the label. The words placed on the label-card establish a link among artist, work <strong>of</strong> art, and<br />

viewer. This link is most significant to the viewer in that the label-card informs her verbally<br />

about the artwork. This verbal information supplements her aesthetic experience <strong>of</strong> the piece.<br />

The information on the label-card “names” the viewer’s aesthetic experience.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!