SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

oots in intellect, in cognition and memory in abstraction dominated by limbic process
imprisons even the most intellectual of “will”.
Free-Will is then dependent on a science that is itself free and freeing in “will”. A science that
is itself freed in cognition and memory of all limbic dominance, that makes a priority of freeing
us all through an ever evolving abstraction and objectivity in memory and cognition, in
research and theory. Such a science gives us the objective tools through which to deconstruct
all dominance of limbic paleo-logic, all dominance of meme and imitative memory.
In combining these ideas I give special importance to linkage, to the transparent or opaque
kinds of cognition, semantics and conceptual relationships within which linkage can occur.
I argue that however expedient or better-safe-than-sorry the linkage limbic-cognition is, it is in
its transparency in process, stored as it is in the nervous system circuitry, able to contain little if
any opaqueness and therefore abstraction in cognition. As such it is open to all kinds of error
within the narrow corridor of truth in cognition the limbic is. There is no distinguishing of fact
from fiction, as the octopus certainly could not distinguish within the teddy bear experiment.
A free-will in intellect would have deciphered the danger as the laboratory technician and not
the teddy bear.
The point here is that we Sapiens Sapiens with all our bio-brain-system evolution in
prefontalness, with all our potential in cognition, in linkage that is abstract-cognitive dominant,
we despite that potential create cultures within which we are acculturated to cognize as if our
potential in cognition did not exceed that of the octopus.
The problem with our acquiring large stores of memory out of limbic-linkage, is that so much
of it organizes itself around the dis-information and error inherent to the bias of its retributive
logic in emotional-bodyfeltness. Especially when such bias in logic seeks to manipulate, control
and exploit. Keep in mind that limbic-memory is conditioned in many subtle and cruel-abusive
ways within the amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus, somatics of meaning-relationships
dominated by memory in retributive-bias.
The foundation of this process is of course cultural, and is driven by an acculturation that
begins in the environment of the womb which speaks to the quality of life experienced and biochemically-
remembered by the mother. It is these bio-chemical memories as they are tainted
by pollutants and trauma, that Lipton in his theory of the Biology of Consciousness, outlines as
negatively effecting the mitochondria and therefore chromosomes and genes as they organize
the forming fetus.
Similar conclusions are voiced by Matt Ridely in Genome, and in Our Stolen Future , by Colbrn,
Dumanoski and Meyers. In a review of Our Stolen Future Pat Cody writes:
Harmonally active synthetic chemicals are thugs on the biological information
highway that sabotage vital communication. They mug the messengers or
impersonate them. They jam signals. They scramble messages. They sow
disinformation. They wreak all of havoc. Because hormone messages
orchestrate many critical aspects of development, from sexual differentiation to
30