SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

once, but most of the time it is a selective number of tracks that play. Each track or layer with a
cognitive mode linkage and coding that is specific to it. Each track or layer in more or less
transparency or opaqueness, in more or less will-in-intellect, bound more or less in limbic-will
in bias, and retributive error, or in will free in abstraction, free in will in intellect in objectiveresearch.
The dominances in cognitive-mode, in memory and process in linkage of the earliest
developmental stages being most influential, even dominating the cognitive function thereby
organizing the cognitive will of all other developmental stages to the extent that they through
acculturation are favored. In this way our most primal meme-imitative memory in cognition
serves to parent and co-parent all the will in linkage that follows.
In behavior, the final outcome is as predictable as the will in memory and cognition that has
been in acculturation embedded and compressed as cues and the dominances in will of the
various layers triggered by the cues. The cues and layers organize creating critical-masses,
focuses of dominances in memory in cognitive-mode, in narrative and perceptual mode. The
clustering of layers behave like cliques each layer triggering a memory in dance through all the
layers that resonates at its shared frequency in will, creating a network of linkage of cognitivewill,
of layers of identities and realities in memory in cognition that then in conflict and
cooperation represent us in behavior. The reference here for “cliques” is outlined in the
footnote of p.122, of Global Brain authored by Howard Bloom. Bloom writes:
In 1998 Kelly K. Kissing, whose research focuses on a common North
American genus of spider, Dolomedes, completed a study of the fishing spider
Dolmedes triton and reported a resolute tendency to create differences between
cliques among these eight legged subjects. Groups with the same ancestry tend
to harrumph themselves into difference by embracing incompatible mating
rituals. Though the aquatic arachnids may continue to live in each others
vicinity, the clumps of quibblers refuse to mate with an outsider who does his
mating dance “all wrong”. This “reproductive isolation” is precisely the kind
which leads to genetic separation between groups. In the case of modern
humans, it also leads to cultural diversity.
I propose that these layers to the extent that they are limbic dominant, will through time, in
synaptic-patterning form relationships within their common cognitive will, each with a trigger
that links them, that associates them no matter the inherent potential in linkage of the biobrain
developmental stage they represent. The result is a imbic-network of narrative, of
behaviors and symbols so psychosomatically layered and intertwined, that like the gordianknot,
will not be easily untied.
Is this not the process in cognition and memory that we Sapiens Sapiens continue to be
acculturated to. How else to explain the extent and extremes in disinformation in bias that is at
the center of so much of our communications, that could not otherwise succeed as truth. Bias
and propaganda succeeds as truth because its limbic paleo-logic is compatible with the failure
in truth in memory and cognition inherent to the limbic-logic of our cognitive-immaturity.
To the extent that we are in cognitive-immaturity we have since infancy been acculturated to
limbic bias and propaganda in truth, and in that truth have run commercials of others and our
33