SECTION 1 - via - School of Visual Arts

Sliding back to Cro-Magnon, back to Neanderthal, to H. habilis, to the pre-Habilis Hominids
without a Broca’s area, or any other “verbal-twiddlers”, we witness also less, and less
prefrontalness, in bio-brain system development, we witness in a downward spiral to more and
more limbic meme and imitative-autonomic memory inherent to our species earliest limbic
system dominant bio-brain system architecture.
Within each slide back we encounter an ever devolving, culture and acculturation, with each
slide back in time through the branches of our species family tree there is a further regression
in memory and cognition that is more and more limbic-paleo-logic, more and more bodyfeltautonomic-sensory-associational.
Like the pre-frontally damaged of our present day who to the degree of that damage, are
limbic-dominant in memory and cognition, our less pre-frontal-lobe-system evolved ancestors,
as we look back to each less evolved branch of our species family tree, had at least the same
difficulty in their ever increasing limbic-dominance making it more and more difficult for them
to learn mazes, make plans, or spontaneously organize behavior. Like the pre-frontally
damaged of our present day a slide back through each branch of our species family tree
presents us with an ever increasing difficulty in our species forming, no less choosing from a
variety of alternatives. Innovation which depends on abstraction, and abstractions transferring
of objective information from one task to another, and one context to another becomes with
each slide back more painfully slow, and finally as with unbiased consideration of others nonexistent.
What is no longer arguable, is that within this “Nature,” nurture as each uniquely impacted on
our species bio-brain-systems evolution that our memory and cognition in memes and imitative
memory evolved to objectivity within its potential in evolution to the extent that our inherent
potential in semantics in abstraction, in symbol encoding and recoding was nurtured. It is a
history of evolving memory and cognition that also reveals that to the extent that the evolving
inherent potential in memory and cognition were not nurtured, that the resulting limbicdominance
with its immaturity in memory and cognition, when exposed to development in
objectivity in intention, there is a freeing of memory and cognition from dominance in limbicsubjectivity
and bias.
Intention is then the critical factor in nurture, to the extent that intention involves the freeing
of memory and cognition to objectivity, memory and cognition is within its inherent bio-brain
system potential able to asserts itself through developments in intellect in objectivity, and
within the inherent potential of Sapiens Sapiens to free-will in intellect, and higher-purpose in
intention.
Unfortunately our species history, nurtures role in evolution mostly reveals that the limbicsystem
in its inherent limbic-logic has been permitted to dominate our species development in
abstraction. The result has been a history of development dominated by a nurturing of memory
and cognition wherein we have introduced with each educated generation more and more
abstractly complex subjective retributive behavioral-memes in service of our memory in
archaic-error in cognition.
In this history of nurturing limbic-dominance of abstraction we have succeeded in introducing
into our world of culture process, into our species imitative-body-mind-memory, a more
50