Patterns of time use in Tanzania: how to make public investment in ...
Patterns of time use in Tanzania: how to make public investment in ...
Patterns of time use in Tanzania: how to make public investment in ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 5.2.3: Participation rate, mean <strong>time</strong> among participants and mean <strong>time</strong><br />
among population by sex and ho<strong>use</strong>hold <strong>in</strong>come<br />
Adult females Adult males<br />
Y100,000 Y100,000<br />
Participation rate Percentage (%)<br />
Clean<strong>in</strong>g ho<strong>use</strong> and care <strong>of</strong> clothes 85.4 88.0 84.9 40.7 45.0 42.0<br />
Do it yourself 12.3 11.9 10.9 23.3 20.5 17.3<br />
Chopp<strong>in</strong>g wood 28.3 22.6 20.7 11.3 7.6 4.6<br />
Other 35.4 49.4 45.2 33.0 33.4 31.9<br />
Mean among participants Absolute m<strong>in</strong>utes per day<br />
Clean<strong>in</strong>g ho<strong>use</strong> and care <strong>of</strong> clothes 32.6 42.7 43.5 21.0 22.0 25.6<br />
Do it yourself 42.6 38.8 25.7 56.3 45.1 42.2<br />
Chopp<strong>in</strong>g wood 16.1 18.5 20.7 18.4 12.6 22.5<br />
Other 15.7 15.4 17.3 16.4 18.7 20.8<br />
Mean among population Absolute m<strong>in</strong>utes per day<br />
Clean<strong>in</strong>g ho<strong>use</strong> and care <strong>of</strong> clothes 27.9 37.5 37.0 8.5 10.0 10.7<br />
Do it yourself 5.2 4.6 2.8 13.1 9.2 7.3<br />
Chopp<strong>in</strong>g wood 4.6 4.2 4.3 2.1 1.0 1.0<br />
Other 5.6 7.6 7.8 5.4 6.2 6.6<br />
Source: Calculations from the 2006 <strong>Tanzania</strong> TUS<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>to</strong> be highlighted <strong>in</strong> Table 5.2.4 is that<br />
while women’s participation rates <strong>in</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g, and the average duration <strong>of</strong><br />
their task, are higher <strong>in</strong> male headed ho<strong>use</strong>holds, men’s participation <strong>in</strong><br />
clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates a significantly higher participation <strong>in</strong> female headed<br />
ho<strong>use</strong>holds (59 percent compared with 40 percent).<br />
29