29.03.2013 Views

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

Chapter 2<br />

Visiting<br />

In delineating the sc<strong>and</strong>alous environment of Bethiem the public visiting of its patients has stan-<br />

dardly been portrayed by historians as the greatest sc<strong>and</strong>al of all. It has now become almost a<br />

historical platitude to exemplify the brutalising of the insane in the classical period by describ-<br />

ing how Bethlem's patients were exhibtted, teased, ridiculed, provoked, abused, <strong>and</strong> otherwise<br />

subjected to the 'impertinent curiosity of sightseers at a mere penny [or tuppence] a time' .<br />

As zoo <strong>and</strong> freakshow, Bethlem has served 'as emblematic of an overriding cosmology of mad-<br />

ness, whereby 'the madman in confinement was treated no better than a beast', or 'monster'2.<br />

Accordingly, the curtailing of visiting there in 1770 has been seen as signalling the humanising<br />

of the madman, his elevation from animal to patient, a profound disjunction from former at-<br />

titudes, the product of a new 'Age of Sensibility', a kind of psychiatric peresiroika. While, in<br />

the most general terms, this paradigm remains persuasive, in adopting it so unequivocally, some<br />

historians have ignored (their own) prudent warnings against 'an overgenerahised <strong>and</strong> monolithic<br />

interpretation of the asylum' 3 . Here it is largely a question of tone. The polemic of late eigh-<br />

teenth <strong>and</strong> nineteenth century reformers, <strong>and</strong> of earlier protesters against public visiting, has to<br />

some extent been assumed in the shocked tones of modern historians, <strong>and</strong> has led to distortions<br />

<strong>and</strong> discrepancies in their accounts. While some historians accept that indiscriminate visiting<br />

ceased in 1770, others claim that Bethiem displayed its inmates 'throughout the [eighteenth]<br />

century', or 'at a time when such public shows had become unthinkable in post-Revolutionary<br />

France'4 . In fact, more than 30 years after shows had (more or less) ended at Bethiem, they<br />

were still being conducted at Charenton by Coulmier 5 . It is a gross exaggeration to say that<br />

1 Scull, Maaesm,, 63.<br />

2 Thid; Foucault, Madness, 70.<br />

Digby, Madness, Morality <strong>and</strong> Medicine: A Slady of the York Retreat, 1796-1914 (Cambridge, CUP, 1985),<br />

2 & 85.<br />

Scull, Jthsersms, 63; Klaus Doerner, Madmen <strong>and</strong> the Boargeoisie: A Social Jluiory of Insanity <strong>and</strong><br />

Psychiatry, trans. J. Ncugroschel & i. Steinberg (Oxford, Basil Blacjcwell, 1981), 40.<br />

Sunday displays continued at Bicétre until the Revolution; Foucaiilt, Madness, 68-69.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!