29.03.2013 Views

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in four public newspapers <strong>and</strong> posted 'upon the Pillars of this hospital'; that the outer gates<br />

<strong>and</strong> front windows be kept locked <strong>and</strong> shut; <strong>and</strong> that staff 'attend their duty diligently during<br />

these three ilolydays'; conjure up clearly enough the kind of holiday siege to which the hospital<br />

had formerly been subjected 423 . Sundays <strong>and</strong> public holidays had throughout the period been<br />

occasions for licentiousness of all sorts; for drunkenness, feasting, dancing, sexual indulgence,<br />

laughter, physical exertion, impudence, aggression, violence, <strong>and</strong> generally letting off steam;<br />

despite the interdicts <strong>and</strong> efforts of authorities <strong>and</strong> moral reformers aimed at curbing the worst<br />

excesses424 . Plainly the riotous, carnival atmosphere of such days had occasionally been trans..<br />

posed to the galleries of Bethlem. While the Governors were tardy in taking any effectual action,<br />

poors' box receipts (Figz 2a suggest that it was only in the 1760s that holiday visiting reached<br />

its summit425 . The gradual curtailment of visiting in the 1760s cannot simply be interpreted<br />

as a reaction to the mounting disenchantment of the educated public. It was partly an internal<br />

response to an escalation of the problems posed by visitors beyond the hospital's capacity to<br />

cope. Undoubtedly, the historiography of visiting has been tainted by the publicity given to<br />

holiday excesses, <strong>and</strong> by the self-righteous indignation of succeeding generations 4 . Those who<br />

did pillory the practice of visiting over the duration of the period were primarily outraged with<br />

'the holiday mob', rather than with visiting per se 427 . One must not presume, however, that<br />

the riots of holiday periods were a generalised phenomenon at Bethiem.<br />

Staff, Visitors And The Poors' Boxes<br />

Perhaps the major obstacle frustrating the Governors' efforts to restrain the access <strong>and</strong> conduct<br />

of visitors, was that their staff were more interested in supplementing their meagre wages out<br />

of spectators' pockets. Originally, in point of fact, staff were absolutely forbidden 'to begge or<br />

require anything of any p[er}son coming to Bethlem for.. .their paines', but were supposed to<br />

423 m.<br />

424 See e.g. Malcolmeon, Recreal,ons, asp. chap. 5.<br />

425 Indeed, the very year before additional holiday policing was introduced at Rethiem, takings for the fist time<br />

topped £450, over one third of which was taken during April, May <strong>and</strong> December alone<br />

426 For an example of this retrospective distorted disdain, see Charles Dickens, A Ctrio. Dance, in Uncoflecf ad<br />

Wrthngi (ed.), Stone, vol. ii, 382: '[at) Bethlehem Hospital...lunatice were chained, naked in rows of cages that<br />

flanked a promenade, <strong>and</strong> were wondered <strong>and</strong> jeered at through iron bars by <strong>London</strong> loungers'. See, also, Daniel<br />

Hack Tuke, CIsapers is the H,sory of the Insane in the Brit,dt Isles (<strong>London</strong>, 1882).<br />

427 See e g. Tryon, Dreams md Vi,, on,, 290; de Saussure, Travel,, 93; BCGM, 27 January 1742, fol. 175, &<br />

The World, no. xxiii, 138.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!