29.03.2013 Views

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

Queen Mary and Westfield College London University PhD Thesis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

had refused to cater3.<br />

During the seventeenth century, the majority of the insane were retained in their localities,<br />

with their families or parish nurses. While this remained true even as alternative provision mush-<br />

roomed during the latter seventeenth <strong>and</strong> eighteenth centuries, around six times as many insane<br />

parishioners as before, from the metropolitan area at least, were now being maintained outside<br />

their neighbourhoods, in institutional care, at Bethlem <strong>and</strong> other hospitals, at private mad-<br />

houses, <strong>and</strong> at workhouses. Between them, the ten <strong>London</strong> parishes I have examined in depth<br />

(Alihallows Lombard Street, Alihallows the Great, St. Benet Paul's Wharf, St. Botoiph Alder-<br />

sgate, St. Botoiph Bishopsgate, St. Bride, St. Dionis Backchurch, St. Dunstan in the West, St.<br />

Sepulchre (<strong>London</strong>) & St. Stephen Coleman Street), utilised a wide range of institutional provi-<br />

sion for their insane parishioners, during this period. Among't the private madhouses, Iloxton<br />

<strong>and</strong> Bethnal Green were particularly popular (being the largest <strong>and</strong> cheapest), although others,<br />

including those at White Cross Alley, Moorfields; Finsbury; Hackney; Dog Row, Mile End New<br />

Town <strong>and</strong> Newington; were used in a more limited way. St. Botoiph Bishopsgate alone used at<br />

least four (<strong>and</strong> possibly five) private houses for its insane parishioners prior to 1720; supporting<br />

three paupers at John Biggs's (Bromley?) madhouse during 1676-78; one at John <strong>and</strong> Jane<br />

Smith's Hackney madhouse during 1698-1700; five at John (or/<strong>and</strong> William) Ingram's Stepney<br />

madhouse during 1715-19, <strong>and</strong> fifteen at Robert (<strong>and</strong> Thomas) Rhoden's Moorfields madhouse<br />

during 1695-1720. 324 Bargains were also struck with physicians <strong>and</strong> other practitioners, some<br />

of whom must also have kept small, private establishments; amongst them Dr. Fabricius/cay<br />

(active in the 1720s), <strong>and</strong> Dr. Charles Browne, of Newport Pagnell, Bucks. Of a number of<br />

workhouses available to these parishes, those at Cheshunt, Herts <strong>and</strong> Iloxton, were commonly<br />

taken advantage of, while others at Bishopsgate, Tottenham, St. <strong>Mary</strong> Newington. Spitalfields,<br />

were also used.<br />

Of five St. Dionis parishioners admitted to Bethlem during 1639-1700, for example, nol one<br />

appears to have been supported in a private madhouse or workhouse. Of fourteen, admitted<br />

during 1700-69, however, at least three had been supported at Miles's Hoxton madhouse, two<br />

323 See e.g. cases of a mad sailor who escaped from the waggoner <strong>and</strong> was apprehended by parish officer. at<br />

'Main Stoke', in 1742, on his way up to <strong>London</strong> for admission to Bethiem, but whom the officers refused to keep<br />

& the waggoner refused to have anything more to do with; & a lunatic sean,an whom Hicks, Naval Hospital<br />

Surgeon at Sheerness, 'refused to receive' in 1741, claiming his quarters were full, who was ordered to be sent up<br />

to Bethlem. Parish officer, <strong>and</strong> other authorities often had to pay waggoner. considerable fees to agree to take<br />

lunatics up to <strong>London</strong>. See PRO Kew ADM 99/15, fol. 387; ADM 99/15 fols 151 & 155.<br />

324 Churchwardens' accounts from the 1770., reveal that, subsequently, Bishopagate, like most city parishes,<br />

was to rely on Bethnal Green & Hoxton primarily for such provision, but its poor relief accounts not being extant<br />

for the period 1720-63, the transition is impossible to chart.<br />

498

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!