TRENDS AND IMPACTS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRY AGRICULTURE

Recommendations

Info

THAIL<strong>AND</strong> Trends and impacts of foreign investment in developing country agriculture Bank of Thailand 2010. Foreign Direct Investment Statistics, Balance of Payments Statistics Team, Information Management Bureau. Board of Investment 2006. 40 Years of BOI (in Thai), Office of the Board of Investment. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Forsans, N. & K. T. Reilly. 2001. Increasing the size of the “country”: regional economic integration and foreign direct investment in a globalised world economy. Management International Review, 41(3): 251-74. Coxhead, I. & Plangpraphan, J. 1999. Economic Boom, Financial Bust, and the Decline of Thai Agriculture: Was Growth in the 1990s too fast? Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 11(1): 1-17. Department of Commercial Registration 1999. Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999), Bureau of Business Registration, Department of Commercial Registration. Dunning, J. H. 1986. The investment development cycle and third world multinationals. In Khan, K. M., ed., Multinationals of the south: new actors in the international economy. London: Pinter Publishers. Dunning, J. H., Van Hoesel, R., & R. Narula. 1998. Third world multinationals revisited: new developments and theoretical implications. In Dunning, J. H., editor, Globalisation, trade and investment. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Fong, P. E. & Komaran, R. V. 1985. Singapore multinationals. Columbia Journal of World Business, Summer: 35-43. Furtan, W. & Holzman, J. J. 2004. The Effect of FDI on Agriculture and Food Trade: An Empirical Analysis. Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series No.68. Ontario: Statistics Canada, Agriculture Division. Harberger, A. C. 1996. Reflections on Economic Growth in Asia and the Pacific. Journal of Asian Economics, 7(3): 365-392. Hobday, M. 1994. Technological Learning in Singapore: A Test Case of Leapfrogging. Journal of Development Studies, 30(4): 831-58. IMF 2001. Malaysia: From Crisis to Recovery: International Monetary Fund. 120 Japanese Chamber of Commerce. 2010. Survey of business sentiment on Japanese corporations in Thailand: for the spring, the 1st half of 2010: Japanese Chamber of Commerce in Bangkok. Johnston, B. F. & Mellor, J. W. 1961. The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development. The American Economic Review, 51 (4) 566-593. Julian, C. C. 2001. Japanese foreign direct investment in Thailand. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 37(1): 7-18. Kerner, A. 2009. Why Should I Believe You? The Costs and Consequences of Bilateral Investment Treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53: 73-102. Kohpaiboon, A. 2003. Foreign Trade Regimes and the FDI-Growth Nexus: A Case Study of Thailand. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2): 55-81. Kohpaiboon, A. 2006. Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillover: A Cross-Industry Analysis of Thai Manufacturing. World Development, 34(3): 541-556. Lecraw, D. J. 1977. Direct investment by firms from less developed countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 29(4): 442-57. Lecraw, D. J. 1992. Third world MNEs once again: the case of Indonesia. In Buckley, P. J. & M. Casson, editors, Multinational enterprises in the world economy: essays in honour of John Dunning. Hants: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Lee, J. W. 2004. A new paradigm for the Korean economy: advanced state development (ASD) model approach. In Harvie, C., Lee, H. & J. Oh, eds. The Korean economy: post-crisis policies, issues and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Martin, W. & Warr, P. 1994. Determinants of Agriculture’s Relative Decline: Thailand. Agricultural Economics, 11(2): 219-235. National Economic and Social Development Board 2008. National Income of Thailand, Bangkok, Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. National Food Institute of Thailand 2008a. A forecast of Thailand’s food export trend in 2008. Bangkok: National Food Institute of Thailand.
National Food Institute of Thailand 2008b. Thai food industry situation report. Bangkok: National Food Institute of Thailand. National Food Institute of Thailand 2010a. Thai food industry situation report in 2009 and trend in 2010. Bangkok: National Food Institute of Thailand. National Food Institute of Thailand 2010b. Thai food industry situation report (first four months, half year trend and overview of 2010). Bangkok: National Food Institute of Thailand. Netayalak, P. 2008. Characteristics and Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Thai Agricultural Production. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal, 28(1): 1-18. Neumayer, E. & Spess, L. 2005. Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development, 33(10): 1567-85. Nuannim, M. & Kaewpornsawan, S. 2010. “Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): implications and policies”, Bank of Thailand. Office of Agricultural Economics 2007. Economic and social conditions of farmer households and agricultural labor 2006-2007. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics. Office of Agricultural Economics 2009. Outlook on agriculture 2009 and trend in 2010. Bangkok: OfficeSricultural Economics. Ohmae, K. 1985. Triad power. New York: The Free Press. Pananond, P. 2007. The changing dynamics of Thai multinationals after the Asian economic crisis. Journal of International Management, 13: 356-75. Peng, M. W. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Poapongsakorn, N. 2006. The Decline and Recovery of Thai Agriculture: Causes, Responses, Prospects and Challenges. Rapid Growth of selected Asian economies: lessons and implications for agriculture and food security. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Poapongsakorn, N., Siamwalla, A., Titapiwatanakun, B., Netayalak, P., Suzuki, P., Pookpakdi, A. & P. Preedasak. (1995) Part 3: Policies for attracting FDI and impacts on national economic development Agricultural Diversification / Restructuring of Agricultural Production Systems in Thailand, A Paper prepared for The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Bangkok, Thailand Development Research Institute. Porter, M. E. 1990. Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. Rock, M. 1995. Thai Industrial Policy: How Irrelevant was It to Export Success? Journal of International Development, 7(5): 759-73. Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. 1990. Global corporate strategy and trade policy. London: Routledge. Sattaphon, W. 2006. Do Japanese Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Stimulate Agricultural Growth in East Asia? Panel Cointegration Analysis. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast, Australia. Siamwalla, A. 1996. Thai Agriculture: From Engine of Growth to Sunset Status. TDRI Quarterly Review, 11(4): 3-10. Sim, A. B. 2006. Internationalization strategies of emerging Asian MNEs-case study evidence on Singaporean and Malaysian firms. Asia Pacific Business Review, 12(4): 487-505. Suphannachart, W. & Warr, P. 2009. Research and Productivity in Thai Agriculture. EconPapers 2009-11: Departmental Working Papers from Australian National University, Economics, RSPAS. Thai Ministry of Industry, 2002. National master plan for Thai food industry. Bangkok: Office of Industrial Economics, Thai Ministry of Industry. Thailand’s National Statistical Office 1997. Report Of the 1997 Industrial Census, Whole Kingdom: Thailand’s National Statistical Office, Office of the Prime Minister. Thailand’s National Statistical Office 2007. Report of the 2007 Industrial Census, Whole Kingdom: Thailand’s National Statistical Office, Office of the Prime Minister. Urata, S. & Yokota, K. 1994. Trade liberalization and productivity growth in Thailand, The Developing Economies, 32(4): 444-459. Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190-207. 121 THAIL<strong>AND</strong>
Page 1 and 2:
TRENDS AND IMPACTS OF FOREIGN INVES
Page 3:
Trends and impacts of foreign inves
Page 6 and 7:
Acronyms ABRAF Brazilian Associatio
Page 8 and 9:
EAC East African Community EC Execu
Page 10 and 11:
JV Joint Venture Kascol Kaleya Smal
Page 12 and 13:
PTF Privatization Trust Fund PTS Pe
Page 15:
Foreword Large-scale international
Page 18 and 19:
xvi Page 4. The business climate fo
Page 20 and 21:
xviii Page 4. Investments by transn
Page 22 and 23:
xx Page 7. Conclusions and recommen
Page 24 and 25:
xxii Page SENEGAL: ASSESSING THE NA
Page 26 and 27:
xxiv Page PART 5: SYNTHESIS OF FIND
Page 28 and 29:
TANZANIA: ANALYSIS OF PRIVATE INVES
Page 30 and 31:
ZAMBIA: INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL
Page 32 and 33:
xxx Page Table 4 Foreign investment
Page 34 and 35:
xxxii Page Table 5 Additional tax b
Page 36 and 37:
PART 4: BUSINESS MODELS FOR AGRICUL
Page 39:
P A R T O N E INTRODUCTION
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 53 and 54:
1. Introduction 1 Foreign Direct
Page 55 and 56:
FIGURE 2 Trends in FDI-African case
Page 57 and 58:
FIGURE 6 Average annual growth in c
Page 59 and 60:
FIGURE 9 Share of agriculture in to
Page 61 and 62:
FIGURE 12 FDI flows to agriculture
Page 63:
FIGURE 18 Agricultural Investment i
Page 67 and 68:
Improving the business climate for
Page 69 and 70:
BOX 1 A brief history of FDI in Bra
Page 71 and 72:
BOX 2 TNCs and the Brazilian agrifo
Page 73 and 74:
BOX 3 Monsanto Company Part 3: Poli
Page 75 and 76:
BOX 5 International Paper Company P
Page 77 and 78:
the same time, conserving natural r
Page 79 and 80:
CHART 2 Factors that contributed to
Page 81 and 82:
TABLE 3 Performance of Brazil for s
Page 83 and 84:
BOX 6 Checklist for Foreign Direct
Page 85 and 86:
factors that affect, lead to succes
Page 87 and 88:
CHART 4 PROMECIF phases cycle Phase
Page 89 and 90:
the priority indicators within thes
Page 91 and 92:
73 rd in a total of 182 countries e
Page 93 and 94:
Sutainable Development: Lessons fro
Page 95:
World Bank. 2009. Awakening Africa
Page 98 and 99:
TANZANIA Trends and impacts of fore
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109: TANZANIA Trends and impacts of fore
Page 129 and 130: : Foreign investment and agricultur
Page 131 and 132: the two data sources are compiled o
Page 133 and 134: survey (accounting to approximately
Page 135 and 136: Students are entitled to tuition fe
Page 137 and 138: Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA), was s
Page 139 and 140: Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdo
Page 141 and 142: FIGURE 1 Investment promotion polic
Page 143 and 144: percent of GDP in 2001considerably
Page 145 and 146: Philippines indicate their signific
Page 147 and 148: TABLE 4 Foreign investment approved
Page 149 and 150: TABLE 6 Export-oriented FDI in the
Page 151 and 152: followed by fisheries, livestock an
Page 153 and 154: FDI and employment The impact of FD
Page 155 and 156: TABLE 12 Employment generated by fo
Page 157: BOI investment promotion policy are
Page 161 and 162: : Analysis of private investment in
Page 163 and 164: FIGURE 3 Value of planned foreign i
Page 165 and 166: TABLE 1 Investment incentives, Ugan
Page 167 and 168: TABLE 3 Summary of enterprises in c
Page 169 and 170: Over 95 percent of the total annual
Page 171 and 172: CHART 1 Uganda coffee value chain C
Page 173 and 174: CHART 2 Value chain of chrysanthemu
Page 175 and 176: CHART 3 Value chain for fish proces
Page 177 and 178: companies and fully owned subsidiar
Page 179 and 180: (a) the decreasing fish stocks and
Page 181 and 182: TABLE 5 Sources of investment finan
Page 183 and 184: Part 3: Policies for attracting FDI
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 6 Market destinations for sel
Page 187 and 188: BOX 9 Community services provided b
Page 189 and 190: BOX 10 Examples of environmental im
Page 191 and 192: contributed to opening internationa
Page 193: Websites 1. faostat.fao.org 2. htt
Page 197 and 198: Local impacts of selected foreign a
Page 199 and 200: linkages; unsecured land ownership;
Page 201 and 202: hectare and 1.5 tonnes per hectare,
Page 203 and 204: 3.2 FDI in agriculture by nationali
Page 205 and 206: form of pure Korean ownership or pa
Page 207 and 208: of the discrepancies between CDC da
Page 209 and 210:
TABLE 7 Distribution of ELCs by nat
Page 211 and 212:
the country’s economy. It is ther
Page 213 and 214:
on forest use 13 . Across the count
Page 215 and 216:
The National Strategic Development
Page 217 and 218:
team in December 2010 in the Kompon
Page 219 and 220:
order to transport materials and wo
Page 221 and 222:
other agricultural purposes, but la
Page 223 and 224:
stream (one that is 20-30 m wide) a
Page 225 and 226:
MAFF, prohibited the import of live
Page 227 and 228:
7.5 NGOs/Civil society Local NGOs
Page 229 and 230:
: business models in Ghanaian agri
Page 231 and 232:
TABLE 3 FDI agricultural projects a
Page 233 and 234:
Part 4: Business models for agricul
Page 235 and 236:
level of foreign ownership for each
Page 237 and 238:
land disputes, slowing and complica
Page 239 and 240:
TABLE 6 Ease of doing business in G
Page 241 and 242:
TABLE 8 Selected indicators of the
Page 243 and 244:
estate and out-grower scheme for th
Page 245 and 246:
vice-chairman, secretary, assistant
Page 247 and 248:
are exported, 40 percent are sold t
Page 249 and 250:
strong advocate of bush fire preven
Page 251 and 252:
chiefs, irrespective of whose land
Page 253 and 254:
The Assemblyman of Jimle, a locally
Page 255 and 256:
TABLE 12 Key features of the Solar
Page 257 and 258:
given the lengthy time frame involv
Page 259 and 260:
ESD (Environmentally Sustainable De
Page 261 and 262:
Large-scale agricultural investment
Page 263 and 264:
Touré, 2009). So, agricultural mod
Page 265 and 266:
the lineage holdings to one family
Page 267 and 268:
BOX 2 Content of agricultural inves
Page 269 and 270:
of largescale land acquisitions. 6
Page 271 and 272:
percent); and students, undoubtedly
Page 273 and 274:
BOX 4 The conclusions of the feasib
Page 275 and 276:
Malians. Significant players includ
Page 277 and 278:
out in the absence of strategic pla
Page 279 and 280:
ESIAs. The mass influx of foreign i
Page 281 and 282:
objectives, but the contract makes
Page 283 and 284:
in the sugar sector. The aim was to
Page 285 and 286:
stresses the government’s respons
Page 287 and 288:
covering 857 hectares of land, plus
Page 289 and 290:
Final remarks about project design
Page 291 and 292:
As a result, activities to implemen
Page 293 and 294:
and rural electrification (Agence M
Page 295 and 296:
shareholders began to ask questions
Page 297 and 298:
so far. The revenues received from
Page 299 and 300:
were allocated to investment projec
Page 301:
family farmers to have access to le
Page 304 and 305:
SENEGAL Trends and impacts of forei
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
ZAMBIA Trends and impacts of foreig
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 361 and 362:
The findings of the studies present
Page 363 and 364:
3. The significance of business mod
Page 365 and 366:
were introduced to enhance producti
Page 367 and 368:
The presence of enabling factors is
Page 369:
5.8 Type of production system and c
Page 373 and 374:
The available data confirm that the
Page 375 and 376:
the project. This situation increas
Page 377 and 378:
debates on resource-seeking foreign
Page 379 and 380:
programmes for government officials
Page 382:
EDITED BY: Pascal Liu Suffyan Korom
show all

TRENDS AND IMPACTS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRY AGRICULTURE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?