21.04.2013 Views

6_Glorious_Epochs_of_Indian_History

6_Glorious_Epochs_of_Indian_History

6_Glorious_Epochs_of_Indian_History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

loo SIX GLORIOUS EPOCHS OF INDIAN HISTORY<br />

army crossed the Narmada in order to march upon the-<br />

Andhras themselves and subdued a corner <strong>of</strong> Aparantak<br />

(north Konkan). But mindful <strong>of</strong> the concentrated armed<br />

might <strong>of</strong> the Andhras, Kanishka dared not attack them. So<br />

he withheld his southern conquests forthwith. Thereafter he<br />

marched with a huge army to oppose the Chinese general who<br />

had invaded his north-Himalayan territories. After a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> battles, he vanquished even the Chinese general and<br />

annexed the Chinese provinces <strong>of</strong> Kashgar (Tashkand),.<br />

Chaskand, and Khotan to his empire.<br />

THE TEST OF A NATION'S PROWESS AND ITS<br />

RIGHT TO LIVE<br />

237. The propriety <strong>of</strong> recounting this whole incident<br />

here is to show clearly that this sudden eruption <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Saka-Kushans throughout Asia did not convulse India alone;<br />

it discomfited even the then strongly built and well-organised<br />

empire like China too for a time on the battlefield*". But just<br />

as it is tom-foolery, born out <strong>of</strong> jealousy, to say that the<br />

Chinese nation had been weak throughout all these years and<br />

was never better fitted for anything else than to be rotting<br />

in slavery simply because they suffered temporary defeats<br />

against the Saka-Kushans or at some such other times, it is<br />

equally foolish and jealously blind to say, as some <strong>of</strong> our<br />

enemies do, that the <strong>Indian</strong> national life was a series <strong>of</strong><br />

defeats. It only shows that they cannot read history<br />

properly.<br />

238. It is not the number <strong>of</strong> foreign aggressions over<br />

a nation that is the last criterion <strong>of</strong> deciding its vitality or<br />

virulity or the absence <strong>of</strong> both, but the query, whether that<br />

nation was destroyed as a result <strong>of</strong> those aggressions or<br />

whether in the final phase <strong>of</strong> that national struggle that<br />

nation was able to overcome those foreign aggressions, that<br />

determines a nation's prowess, its vitality and its right to<br />

live.<br />

239. Let us see which <strong>of</strong> the three, the Sakas, the<br />

Kushans or the <strong>Indian</strong>s, passed this test successfully, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!