24.04.2013 Views

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P'S AND Q'S 149<br />

<strong>the</strong> Falisci, who dwelt within <strong>the</strong> borders of Etruria, <strong>and</strong> to some extent by <strong>the</strong><br />

Sabini."<br />

<strong>The</strong> hnguistic position of <strong>the</strong> Sabines seems uncertain. In <strong>the</strong> pass<strong>age</strong> quoted<br />

Conway enumerates <strong>the</strong>m among <strong>the</strong> tribes who spoke Q dialects, but later on, when<br />

mentioning some of those who had P speech, he adds in a footnote that perhaps Sabine<br />

should be included among <strong>the</strong>se. <strong>The</strong> position of <strong>the</strong> Sabine tongue is <strong>the</strong>n uncertain.<br />

If this were so, <strong>the</strong> same imcertainty may apply to <strong>the</strong> Fahscans, for little if anything<br />

is known directly of <strong>the</strong>ir dialect, but Conway states that it is " certain that <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

akin to <strong>the</strong> Sabines across <strong>the</strong> Tiber, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>ir city was subdued <strong>and</strong> governed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Etruscans.'"^<br />

This leaves us with four tribes, who undoubtedly spoke Q langu<strong>age</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> Latini,<br />

Marsi, ^qui, <strong>and</strong> Hernici. <strong>The</strong> area occupied by <strong>the</strong>m is only roughly indicated by<br />

Conway, but I ga<strong>the</strong>r that he agrees with <strong>the</strong> boundaries delineated by Kiepert.'* <strong>The</strong><br />

map given in Fig. 26 gives <strong>the</strong>se bounds, <strong>and</strong> it will be seen that in many respects <strong>the</strong><br />

region <strong>the</strong>y occupy agrees with <strong>the</strong> area in which all <strong>the</strong> Italian leaf-shaped swords<br />

have been found. <strong>The</strong>re are, however, certain marked differences.<br />

Out of nine swords of Type D, four are found within <strong>the</strong> area of Q speech, <strong>and</strong><br />

one at Sulmona, only just outside <strong>and</strong> within <strong>the</strong> area of Sabine speech. One is a stray,<br />

found somewhere in Apuha, <strong>and</strong> three, toge<strong>the</strong>r with one of Type C, have been found not<br />

far from Lake Trasimene. <strong>The</strong> soHtary sword of Type B, found at Ascoli, seems only<br />

to indicate that <strong>the</strong> line of approach was from <strong>the</strong> east.<br />

Thus it seems that <strong>the</strong>re is a fair equation between <strong>the</strong> swords <strong>and</strong> Q speech, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter must have been driven from <strong>the</strong> Trasimene region, <strong>and</strong> pushed westward in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Sabine area. Of <strong>the</strong> former presence <strong>and</strong> subsequent disappearances of <strong>the</strong> Q<br />

speech from <strong>the</strong> Trasimene region we have no evidence, but we have seen that <strong>the</strong><br />

Etruscans arrived later than <strong>the</strong> leaf-shaped sword people <strong>and</strong> with a superior culture.<br />

We have also found reason for suspecting that <strong>the</strong> Villa-nova folk, who arrived still later,<br />

had made <strong>the</strong>mselves a military aristocracy over <strong>the</strong> Etruscans, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> conquest or<br />

expulsion may have been due to <strong>the</strong>m. We have seen that <strong>the</strong> Fahsci, a tribe with<br />

Sabine affinities, were absorbed by <strong>the</strong> Etruscans. <strong>The</strong>re is nothing inherently<br />

" Ganway (1897) i. 287. '* Kiepert (1882) Tab. viii.<br />

'3 Conway (1897) i. 370.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!